TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

New Docker Desktop: Run WASM Applications Alongside Linux Containers in Docker

58 点作者 3Sophons超过 2 年前

7 条评论

user3939382超过 2 年前
Give me an open source version of this program that runs in CLI and we’ll talk. I think it’s insane that a dev tool in this (low level) category and with this level of popularity is not only closed source but also GUI. I can’t think of any other major tool with those characteristics.<p>I’m on the fence about WASM. The capabilities are impressive, but webpacked JS already nips at the paradigm we had where users could see a legible version of website code running on their computer and WASM makes the problem worse.
评论 #33895008 未加载
评论 #33893805 未加载
评论 #33894075 未加载
评论 #33899442 未加载
jillesvangurp超过 2 年前
Interesting, to use docker as way to package and run wasm stuff. Actually makes sense from the point of view that it&#x27;s yet another thing that needs networking, security, etc. Why reinvent all that when we already have docker, docker-compose, kubernetes, etc. as an API to drive all of that. It doesn&#x27;t matter if underneath it uses wasmer instead of whatever kernel containerization is used for docker, or both. It&#x27;s just another process that launches.<p>And it kind of solves cross platform distribution since unlike docker images, these should run pretty much on any cpu architecture (as long as it has a wasm runtime).
develatio超过 2 年前
I&#x27;d saw this was already discussed here ~1month go: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33320530" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33320530</a><p>That post links to the announcement in Docker&#x27;s blog, which links to the link of op.
nunez超过 2 年前
This feels huge.<p>I haven&#x27;t messed with WASM yet but I do love the idea of being able to build something that targets wasm&#x2F;wasi with Docker like I&#x27;m already doing today and still package all of its dependencies into a single Docker image.<p>I also love the fact that code that targets wasm can run in a browser or on the machine in an isolate without hard forking.
评论 #33895443 未加载
westurner超过 2 年前
Are there relative performance benchmarks that help estimate the overhead of the WASM-recompilation and runtime? How much slower is it to run the same operations with the same code in a runtime with WASI support?<p>Are there cgroups and other container features for WASM applications?<p>Is there any way to tell whether an unsigned WASM bundle is taking 110% of CPU in a browser tab process?<p>Do browser tabs yet use cgroups functionality to limit resource exhaustion risks?<p>Should we be as confident in unsigned WASM in a WASM runtime as with TUF-signed containers?
smcleod超过 2 年前
Nah... docker desktop is pretty dead now that it&#x27;s got restrictive licensing etc... stick to standard open source tools like Colima etc...
评论 #33900810 未加载
pjmlp超过 2 年前
Aka Application Servers reboot.