TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Instagram ads Facebook won't show you (2021)

392 点作者 nixcraft超过 2 年前

13 条评论

johnm212超过 2 年前
It looks like facebook disputed this story<p>&gt; Joe Osborne, a Facebook spokesperson, responded on Twitter on Wednesday saying the screenshots are from early March “when the ad account was briefly disabled for a few days due to an unrelated payments issue.”<p>&gt; Osborne added: “The ads themselves were never rejected as they were never set by Signal to run. The ad account has been available since early March, and the ads that don’t violate our policies could have run since then.”<p>This is from: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;05&#x2F;06&#x2F;facebook-and-signal-are-fighting-over-an-ad-campaign.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;05&#x2F;06&#x2F;facebook-and-signal-are-figh...</a><p>Either way, it&#x27;s a great publicity stunt by Signal.
评论 #33900233 未加载
评论 #33899268 未加载
评论 #33899330 未加载
kennywinker超过 2 年前
These ads follows along in the proud tradition of banned ads that were designed to be banned from the onset because saying &quot;we got banned&quot; is useful for positioning yourself as dangerous to the establishment.
评论 #33898906 未加载
评论 #33898886 未加载
flappyeagle超过 2 年前
I always feel like I&#x27;m the weird one out. The best thing would be no ads. But the second best thing would be hyper-targeted ads because the most annoying thing is ads that are irrelevant to me.<p>When I watch broadcast TV, I hate seeing ads for mattresses, kids toys, menopause medication, home appliances.<p>I want to see ads for camera lenses and cool sneakers.
评论 #33902688 未加载
评论 #33906268 未加载
评论 #33910472 未加载
评论 #33910717 未加载
评论 #33900475 未加载
评论 #33900451 未加载
dymk超过 2 年前
Note that the entity running the ads, in this case Signal, still has no way to identify _who_ was shown the ad. Only Facebook knows that.
评论 #33898988 未加载
jsnell超过 2 年前
(2021)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=27040470" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=27040470</a>
评论 #33899926 未加载
nixcraft超过 2 年前
Context: from Twitter[0] - &quot;When we made Instagram ads to show you just how you got targeted, we got our ad account disabled. But now Facebook is putting it right out there ~ <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;facebook.com&#x2F;ads&#x2F;about&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;facebook.com&#x2F;ads&#x2F;about&#x2F;</a> &quot;<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;signalapp&#x2F;status&#x2F;1600559887742009345" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;signalapp&#x2F;status&#x2F;1600559887742009345</a>
saaaam超过 2 年前
I did something similar, years ago, for twitter ads, using autogenerated videos. They didn’t block me, although not sure it would work today:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thenewinquiry.com&#x2F;taxonomy-of-humans-according-to-twitter&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thenewinquiry.com&#x2F;taxonomy-of-humans-according-to-tw...</a>
Oras超过 2 年前
I don&#x27;t know how this is new in any way.<p>This ad [0] was created 6 years ago showing more than the ads in the article.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=yrjT8m0hcKU" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=yrjT8m0hcKU</a>
blitzar超过 2 年前
The thing is I did see the ads, lots of times ... but it go nothing correct, and really blunted the whole impact.
anonymouse008超过 2 年前
Even though this is old news, I’m curious to know if any of those “attributes” were embellished. I’ve run FB ads myself and wasn’t ever able to find that granular of targeting without deeper relationships, like admin access, with other pages - looks like groups required that if I’m correct?
评论 #33899054 未加载
guywithahat超过 2 年前
I&#x27;ve always had trouble with this publicity stunt. Like banning people for baseless political or personal reasons is bad, but this is directly insulting Instagram. In effect it&#x27;s saying &quot;here&#x27;s the information Instagram has collected on you, now use our platform which doesn&#x27;t collect this information&quot;. Like why would Meta take that reputational hit for a few thousand dollars in the short term. It&#x27;s a bad deal for them and it makes sense to not do it
评论 #33899640 未加载
评论 #33899709 未加载
评论 #33899834 未加载
hadjian超过 2 年前
I might come off a bit naive, but I didn’t picture the data collection being _this_ precise.<p>Now I’m interested in my own data. Are those companies required to offer a means to download your own data?<p>Did anyone do that and if so, was it readable?
TACIXAT超过 2 年前
I wrote a generator for these if you want to make your own.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tacix.at&#x2F;experiments&#x2F;signal" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tacix.at&#x2F;experiments&#x2F;signal</a>