TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Nobody tell Paul Graham but I rebuilt his site to be beautiful

45 点作者 alexjackhughes超过 2 年前

25 条评论

stared超过 2 年前
It is prettier. But it does not mean it provides a better UX.<p>For example, in <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.paulgraham.com&#x2F;articles.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.paulgraham.com&#x2F;articles.html</a> there is a whole list of essays. No pagination (and especially not with a manual link), working with Ctrl+F.<p>The redesign forgets about that. It treats as if only the most recent blog posts mattered, which is not the case. It is not a news outlet, and there are quite a few evergreen posts.<p>Anyway, wishing you all the best with the redesign. :)
评论 #33909646 未加载
评论 #33909538 未加载
评论 #33909627 未加载
评论 #33909564 未加载
评论 #33909696 未加载
gavinray超过 2 年前
We should give credit to the original author of the template; it looks like attribution has been removed:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;timlrx&#x2F;tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;timlrx&#x2F;tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog</a><p>Direct link to preview:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app&#x2F;</a><p>Please leave attribution up for authors of free website templates (IMO), it&#x27;s the nice thing to do.
评论 #33909602 未加载
评论 #33920750 未加载
netchkin超过 2 年前
You know, I actually prefer the original paulgraham.com. I can read the smaller font easily, find the article excerpts useless (as opposed to seeing more titles at once) and the publication dates are also misleading. PG categorizes the articles by month, putting in a day (always the 1st) seems like being lazy to change the template.<p>None of these has anything to do with beautiful in my book.
mikece超过 2 年前
Still laughing at the comment at the bottom of the site: &quot;Paul Graham for people with eyes&quot;
评论 #33909395 未加载
graphpapa超过 2 年前
This is wonderfully perfectly provocative. A clever button pushing projectile innocently lobbed into the everyday pitter patter. An imposter post meant to deviously short circuit the HN tropes&#x27; internal logic.
whitepoplar超过 2 年前
I like PG&#x27;s version better--it has better information density. On my 13&quot; MBA&#x27;s display, I&#x27;m able to see the titles of 31 essays without scrolling. On this site, I can only see two.
评论 #33916553 未加载
yakubin超过 2 年前
It may be prettier, but:<p>1. Links aren&#x27;t underlined[1].<p>2. The links in the footer are indistinguishable from normal text.<p>3. Links in the menu on top are white, while most links are blue.<p>In general, the site lacks consistency around the styling of links.<p>[1]: &lt;<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tempertemper.net&#x2F;blog&#x2F;why-you-should-almost-always-underline-your-links" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tempertemper.net&#x2F;blog&#x2F;why-you-should-almost-alwa...</a>&gt;
WoodenChair超过 2 年前
Really bad form to:<p>- copy someone’s content without their permission (illegal actually)<p>- not link to someone else’s site prominently when you critique it
评论 #33915281 未加载
locallost超过 2 年前
It looks modern, and better, but I don&#x27;t like it. It&#x27;s not good for reading. The font is large, line height huge, side paddings really large, there is very little text per line and too few lines in the screen. There might be a max amount of text per line that can be enjoyed, but too little and I am prevented from really getting into a flow of reading, if that makes sense. It feels herky-jerky.<p>So the operation was a success, but the patient died.
评论 #33909813 未加载
KerrAvon超过 2 年前
Spoiler: It’s about reskinning his website. I was hoping for AI translation of PG’s text into societally useful (or at least interesting) content.<p>Someone should send Graham’s output through an AI filter, informed by Dabblers and Blowhards. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;idlewords.com&#x2F;2005&#x2F;04&#x2F;dabblers_and_blowhards.htm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;idlewords.com&#x2F;2005&#x2F;04&#x2F;dabblers_and_blowhards.htm</a>
peatfreak超过 2 年前
Oh, the arrogance and the irony.
dcminter超过 2 年前
The one improvement I&#x27;d wish upon Paul&#x27;s original site is a correct SSL certificate (it still appears to be configured with a cert for *.store.yahoo.com ) so that one can connect over https instead of http.<p>But that&#x27;s a quibble. Otherwise I see no advantages to the new design over the old one.
pickledish超过 2 年前
Heheh, a lot of criticism here on HN like you might expect -- for what it&#x27;s worth, I really like the design!<p>Also, you have a small CSS bug in the dark-mode version of <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;prettygraham.com&#x2F;blog" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;prettygraham.com&#x2F;blog</a> :)
评论 #33909805 未加载
true_religion超过 2 年前
Rebuilding someone’s <i>personal</i> site to be “prettier” to your own eyes, then widely publicized that is just rude.<p>If you want to do an unauthorized redesign pick a large unloved commercial app. That shows off your skills without coming off as snide bullying of a single persons design.
kaba0超过 2 年前
Now rewrite the content as well to something good!<p>(&#x2F;s, I now I will be crucified for this here :D )
janvdberg超过 2 年前
There is a difference between the original desktop site and the original mobile site. The mobile site looks a bit better (more modern if you will).<p>But this effort looks really good too.<p>I do wonder whether copyright allows this?
评论 #33909545 未加载
tablespoon超过 2 年前
&gt; Nobody tell Paul Graham but I rebuilt his site to be beautiful (prettygraham.com)<p>It&#x27;s not pretty. It has too little whitespace and too much color.<p>To make it <i>truly</i> &quot;pretty,&quot; you need to:<p>* Drop the light blue so it&#x27;s only white, gray, and navy.<p>* Drop the dates and increase spacing so you can only see one article in the screen at at time, instead of three. Showing three whole titles at ones is disorientating and confusing to users.<p>&#x2F;s
alexjackhughes超过 2 年前
It really needed dark mode on desktop, I&#x27;ve saving eyes here Paul.
评论 #33909539 未加载
rumblestrut超过 2 年前
I&#x27;m curious about how any updating would get done with this kind of mirror. Is the content scraped from the original source and then uploaded through an automated process?
Havoc超过 2 年前
Don&#x27;t think he&#x27;ll appreciate his content being scraped and duplicated, regardless of UX
ThinkBeat超过 2 年前
I like the original better. Quite simple, high in valuable content per pixel
jacquesm超过 2 年前
Function over form any day. &#x27;Good wine does not need laurels&#x27;.
swyx超过 2 年前
footnotes are broken.<p>i&#x27;d also love a feature that links metadiscussions on HN, and perhaps ranks by number of upvotes (just as a timesaving thing)
trickpattyyo超过 2 年前
The old one looks like a cicada 3301 puzzle
guntherhermann超过 2 年前
Nice work, very clean!<p>---<p>&quot;Nobody tell him but I&#x27;ll post it to HN.&quot;<p>What is this style of writing about?
评论 #33909525 未加载