> 1. Social media must be resilient to corporate and government control.<p>I disagree with this. I think this falls under Musk's idea that "sunlight is the best disinfectant." [0] Is sunlight the best disinfectant if January 6 groups are finding like minded individuals to commit assassinations. [1]<p>> 2. Only the original author may remove content they produce.<p>What Twitter is doing with ghost banning is unsustainable. The only reason groups such as #NAFO haven't left the platform is because they band together to upvote their posts and comments. But the average person that is shadow banned for calling Musk a jerk or whatever won't see any engagement because their comment will be hidden behind "Show more replies." Compare this to reddit. Your comment is either accepted or rejected. There isn't a grey area.<p>> 3. Moderation is best implemented by algorithmic choice.<p>I don't have a firm opinion on this in general. Moderation by a team seems too slow for real-time Twitter. Perhaps on tweets that get 10,000 replies moderation makes a lot of sense. But on a tweet that gets 100 replies should some tweets be behind "Show more replies" or should they just be at the end of the scroll?<p>I don't see any discussion on how to prioritize tweets from people that don't have a massive following. Some of the tweets I see from people with 10 followers are basically the same as those with 20,000 followers. Why does the guy with 20k tweets get more engagement?<p>The dynamic on twitter with the average user is so different from Reddit. Getting upvotes and engagement on Reddit is 10x easier.<p>[0] <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1521574200183566338" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1521574200183566338</a><p>[1] <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/16/us/politics/jan-6-defendant-assassination-plot.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/16/us/politics/jan-6-defenda...</a>