TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A newspaper vanished from the internet. Did someone pay to kill it?

74 点作者 greenburger超过 2 年前

7 条评论

marcosdumay超过 2 年前
Copyrights killed the content, not whoever brought the paper.<p>If you make it illegal to archive the news, the news don&#x27;t get archived.
评论 #34038999 未加载
评论 #34178941 未加载
pessimizer超过 2 年前
Historical scandals are constantly being rewritten (largely by deletion) on the internet. It&#x27;s even very hard to find details on the robosigning scandals from 2008, which were huge and recent.
评论 #34039409 未加载
评论 #34039048 未加载
评论 #34038712 未加载
评论 #34046211 未加载
评论 #34043502 未加载
评论 #34038744 未加载
coldtea超过 2 年前
It&#x27;s rich (pun intended) for the WP to be posting this, where one of the richest men in the world, with several huge interests and government deals to promote, paid to own it...
评论 #34038675 未加载
评论 #34045878 未加载
评论 #34038638 未加载
alsetmusic超过 2 年前
This is why the Wayback Machine is valuable.
评论 #34178952 未加载
asplake超过 2 年前
Sent down the memory hole <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Memory_hole" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Memory_hole</a>
bell-cot超过 2 年前
Sure sounds like, this time, Betteridge is wrong and the answer is &quot;yes&quot;. If so...well, it was both legal and cheap, and plenty of people with money would have had good (as in &quot;self-serving&quot;) reason to do it.<p>Sadly - but predictably - the Washington Post story ends with &quot;whoever did this horrible thing had a good lawyer, and covered their tracks well&quot;. Zero hint that anything could actually be done to guard against more such bad things happening. Let alone that anyone should get off their &quot;click headline, read story, get angry, repeat&quot; butt and try to do something.<p>Pro Tip: If you&#x27;re selling &#x2F; downsizing &#x2F; closing a web site that&#x27;s full of important information (for history, public interest, etc.), then you should consider donating it to a library with the resources to keep it on-line. Or at least keeping a copy, and put in a clause into the sale contract about free &amp; easy public access having to continue. Or any public library being allowed to also host it, free, if they chose to do so.
评论 #34039908 未加载
drbeast超过 2 年前
If anyone bothers to RTFA, there&#x27;s a blurb in there about the 2004 UVA rape case and a hint that a former victim of the false accusation (now an investment banker) bought the archive, DMCA&#x27;d links to the archive, and then took it all down. Dare I say, dangerously based.
评论 #34039203 未加载
评论 #34039634 未加载