TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How to avoid another world war

17 点作者 hzlatar超过 2 年前

7 条评论

psychphysic超过 2 年前
I rarely agree with Kissinger but he&#x27;s right as far as I can see.<p>I&#x27;d be the first to deride Russia&#x27;s military effectiveness. But consider that the vast majority of the world is against them largely on every single front. And you see why they&#x27;ve earned their reputation as a super power.<p>Russia is big with plenty of fossils. They could ruin the world simply by continuing to use their fossil fuels without regard to climate change.<p>They could nuke themselves.<p>They could conduct a few missile tests in space and precipitate a Kessler syndrome situation.<p>They could trade nuclear secrets for more kamikazi drones.<p>Do you see where I&#x27;m going?<p>If you want Russia destroyed they you are asking for a world war. Peace requires we put up with them and encourage all governments to work for global health.
评论 #34088334 未加载
评论 #34081380 未加载
评论 #34081879 未加载
评论 #34081353 未加载
defrost超过 2 年前
<i>Why Milosevic, but not Kissinger</i>? [1]<p><i>..a stupendous liar with a remarkable memory</i> [2]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;world&#x2F;2002&#x2F;apr&#x2F;25&#x2F;milosevictrial.petertatchell" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;world&#x2F;2002&#x2F;apr&#x2F;25&#x2F;milosevictrial...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Trial_of_Henry_Kissinger" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Trial_of_Henry_Kissinger</a>
hulitu超过 2 年前
&gt; How to avoid another world war by Henry Kissinger<p>tells the guy not known for avoiding wars.
评论 #34081393 未加载
评论 #34099412 未加载
jamincan超过 2 年前
I balk at calls for peace from Henry Kissinger, who didn&#x27;t seem to have qualms at raining death on millions of innocent people for his own personal political gains. Nevertheless, I did read the article.<p>Kissinger&#x27;s framework for understanding the world is still rooted in an outdated cold war mentality and this article seems like he is naively trying to shove the cat back in the bag and return to a paradigm that he felt he understood.<p>But I don&#x27;t think we can return to the way things were. Russia&#x27;s hegemony over its neighbours was not because of its nuclear power, but because of its military power, which it has demonstrated is considerably weaker than we had previously understood. I think this conflict has actually weakened the power of a nuclear arsenal considerably compared to conventional military strength, because it really has no strategic use beyond nuclear deterrence.
评论 #34080884 未加载
评论 #34080934 未加载
评论 #34081530 未加载
评论 #34080737 未加载
评论 #34080598 未加载
ProjectArcturis超过 2 年前
I&#x27;m reminded of the classic Onion headline: &quot;Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made A Great Point&quot;<p>The deal he proposes is that Russia returns to the pre-2022 borders, and Ukraine joins NATO. That second point is critical, because without that protection by Western powers, Russia would surely rearm and reinvade Ukraine in a few years.<p>The alternative is that the war continues for several years, until Putin finally loses the will to fight, or is overthrown. That latter prospect, while initially appealing, would almost certainly result in a new leader who is just as aggressive, but more effective and less isolated.<p>Or, potentially, Russia itself might break up under the strain of prolonged war. We&#x27;ve never had a civil war in a nuclear power, but if you think that has a happy ending, you haven&#x27;t been paying attention so far.
评论 #34080963 未加载
ElfinTrousers超过 2 年前
1. Don&#x27;t let people like Henry Kissinger run things.
dandare超过 2 年前
It is a good first approximation to say that Henry Kissinger is always wrong.