TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Adobe Lightroom uses photos for AI training by default

265 点作者 velmu超过 2 年前

27 条评论

im_jerry87超过 2 年前
Wow! I thought nothing would surprise me anymore about Adobe. But this is a new low even for them.<p>This is ripping off artists and accessing unauthorised content of your customers executed at the highest level. Boggles my mind how this is even legal anywhere especially in countries under EU? Like how this is an opt out and not an opt in?<p>Seems like Content Analysis is turned on by default for the whole creative cloud suite. And, to make it worse, you have to go their site, login to your account and then opt out? Oh boy, I smell a gigantic lawsuit waiting to happen.<p>tweets from artists:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;CrownePrints&#x2F;status&#x2F;1610441583899418624?t=E84zfiFxRW9jXRk3f3l0aQ&amp;s=19" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;CrownePrints&#x2F;status&#x2F;1610441583899418624?...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;SamuelDeats&#x2F;status&#x2F;1610365369134333955?t=E84zfiFxRW9jXRk3f3l0aQ&amp;s=19" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;SamuelDeats&#x2F;status&#x2F;1610365369134333955?t...</a>
评论 #34257872 未加载
评论 #34258112 未加载
评论 #34260444 未加载
version_five超过 2 年前
To me this is industrial espionage rather than copyright infringement. If I post a picture online and you use it some way i didn&#x27;t give permission for, maybe there&#x27;s an infringement case, that&#x27;s not very interesting.<p>Here, we have effectively malware that is taking stuff that was never shared, from a personal or business cloud, and using it for some other purpose. That&#x27;s a much bigger deal, because it involves stuff nobody agreed to make public.<p>I strongly suspect Microsoft does this too with Office. I&#x27;m always catching them trying to make excuses to upload images for &quot;connected experiences&quot; (industrial espionage) and I imagine in the end they just do it. This is a big problem, for example when working as a contractor and dealing with private client data. There is a risk that&#x27;s hard to manage of big vendors stealing data through their software that I don&#x27;t know how to manage
评论 #34265981 未加载
评论 #34261145 未加载
thot_experiment超过 2 年前
The discourse around this stuff seems so insane to me. Am I wrong on this? It feels like the cat is out of the bag and the only way to have generally good outcomes is to go ham on open source models. IMO there&#x27;s a zero percent chance that generative AI can be meaningfully controlled and any efforts to restrict training will only result in fewer people having access to the good models. They will still be created, only by people who don&#x27;t care about the ethics at all, or big corpos who seek to collect rent.<p>I think the only way I see a good outcome is that the FOSS models are so good there&#x27;s no money to be made competing.
评论 #34258392 未加载
评论 #34258132 未加载
评论 #34258033 未加载
评论 #34258220 未加载
dylan604超过 2 年前
A few updates ago, they made it very difficult to save files to your local system. I wonder if this has anything to do with that. It is at the least a very dark UI pattern to get people to use their cloud storage offerings. Add to it that they use any data in the cloud storage as training data just really goes over the top.
jwalton超过 2 年前
If anyone else is looking for how to opt out:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;account.adobe.com&#x2F;privacy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;account.adobe.com&#x2F;privacy</a>
2Gkashmiri超过 2 年前
ah. so people will continue to use this because its the &quot;industry standard&quot; so they have the monopoly to fuck around people all the while these same people will not use&#x2F;improve&#x2F;suggest&#x2F;fund open source alternatives in the classic chicken or egg problem...<p>i am so glad blender project is slowly being accepted. i have a friend who laughed at me 7-8 years ago when i recommended him blender. recently we were talking about some stuff and he brought up blender as in &quot;this is something i should test&quot;. i see that as an absolute win...<p>hopefully there are many other softwares like kdenlive or darktable or inkscape or others that need blender-like movement so that they can be capable alternatives
评论 #34257954 未加载
photoGrant超过 2 年前
I hope to come back to this thread with someone tamping the reality because right now this is as bad and immoral as it gets (as a photographer). You&#x27;d expect at least a fake sense of consumer&#x2F;artist protection from a company like Adobe that NEEDS these customers to survive.<p>But hey, another reason to hate the prison guard landlord.
评论 #34257803 未加载
lvl102超过 2 年前
They are charging you to train AI on your data so that they can charge you even more later.
评论 #34263738 未加载
评论 #34258619 未加载
评论 #34258621 未加载
traceroute66超过 2 年前
I assume this is &quot;Lightroom&quot; and not &quot;Lightroom Classic&quot; (both of which are available via Adobe CC, but Classic is offline, whilst the other was always full-cloud).<p>Historically I&#x27;ve used Lightroom Classic, but I&#x27;ve always been worried about Adobe killing it off one day.<p>I think I might go back to Phaseone Capture One[1]. I tried it a while ago and found it pretty decent, despite the name its not just for Phaseone camera users.<p>[1]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.captureone.com&#x2F;en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.captureone.com&#x2F;en</a>
评论 #34258791 未加载
ThinkBeat超过 2 年前
Does anyone know what they are using it for?<p>Photoshop is improving its &quot;remove background&quot; like feature quite a bit lately. Sporting &quot;AI&quot; in their description.<p>I am not as outraged if that is the main use case.<p>I wonder if Google or Apple uses some form of the images they hold for similar purposes.<p>I can easily argue though that once they have the data they can use it to train all sorts of features including generating art which to me is far more upsetting.
评论 #34258527 未加载
评论 #34258943 未加载
评论 #34258548 未加载
IceHegel超过 2 年前
This is the kind of behavior that customers should be able to sue Adobe for, perhaps winning the rights to any AI system developed using their images.<p>I use Lightroom 5-10 times a year and there was no chance I would have found this option. Feels incredibly invasive to use my work without consent.
评论 #34268855 未加载
nerdjon超过 2 年前
Now I don&#x27;t see anything that implies that this is being used for training AI generated work... but I don&#x27;t see any reason it can&#x27;t be.<p>This has me seriously concerning for not only the future of art but all created work and who actually has the rights to that depending on what you use to make it.<p>What particularly bothers me is how quickly this was just accepted by society. I saw so many people defending it as &quot;fun&quot; because they just don&#x27;t understand how it actually works.<p>I was really hoping that society would push back against AI generated things... that was proven wrong very very quickly.<p>I am sending this to all of my artist friends.
tethys超过 2 年前
Here Adobe provides some more information:<p>&gt; Adobe may analyze your Creative Cloud or Document Cloud content to provide product features and improve and develop our products and services.<p>Nothing in that document seems to indicate this is opt-in.<p>&gt; Let&#x27;s say that you access Creative Cloud or Document Cloud via a personal account and prefer that Adobe doesn&#x27;t analyze your content to develop and improve our products and services. In that case, you may turn off content analysis at any time from your Adobe account.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;helpx.adobe.com&#x2F;manage-account&#x2F;using&#x2F;machine-learning-faq.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;helpx.adobe.com&#x2F;manage-account&#x2F;using&#x2F;machine-learnin...</a>
nbzso超过 2 年前
WOW. Now do this with Figma.<p>&gt;Prompt: Give me an Accessible Design System with all available user stories and tokenize it fully.<p>Let&#x27;s go, Adobe. The future is now. I will grow my own food and f*ck around in the woods.<p>I will own nothing and I will be happy. I promise.
评论 #34270676 未加载
aceazzameen超过 2 年前
I&#x27;m not a professional photographer, so I don&#x27;t have their needs. But Google Picasa still works for my photos. I use Dropbox to sync them off my phone onto my PC.<p>And Krita and Photopea has replaced my need for Photoshop after I dumped Adobe several years ago. And then there&#x27;s mobile apps like Procreate and Infinite Painter. I also own the Affinity products which are quite nice. But I admittedly don&#x27;t use them much.<p>I lost trust in Adobe years ago, especially when every new release for the yearly Adobe Max was full of new bugs. Seeing news like this reminds me to never go back.
SanjayMehta超过 2 年前
I&#x27;m on LR5 and will never upgrade.
评论 #34258574 未加载
t0bia_s超过 2 年前
If I sign exclusive licence contract with my client that guarantee originality of my work (ie logo) without option to sell copyright to others and Adobe break it just like that, it&#x27;s great for lawsuit.<p>Or piracy could be cheaper answer.
alkonaut超过 2 年前
I assume they either make money or plan to make money from it. And as long as it’s optional I guess it’s fine BUT why not give a little cut to those who provide images in the form of a reduced fee?
评论 #34266385 未加载
zython超过 2 年前
This is honestly very convenient. If I ever accidentally delete a picture I can just ask adobe for a backup. Very consumer consious decision on adobes part.
评论 #34259292 未加载
t0bia_s超过 2 年前
It&#x27;s off for me (EU).<p>This is one of many reason why piracy is trend again. You have no option if you want use Adobe SW that you pay for, to use offline.
rado超过 2 年前
FYI Pixelmator Pro has fully replaced Photoshop for me
评论 #34258117 未加载
wahnfrieden超过 2 年前
how is this worse than what stable diffusion &#x2F; openai etc. are doing? these other models also don&#x27;t seek consent, opt-in, licensing
评论 #34262691 未加载
评论 #34262196 未加载
gniting超过 2 年前
Where does one find this setting on the iOS apps? I am not using lightroom anywhere else.
评论 #34262065 未加载
PaulHoule超过 2 年前
It doesn&#x27;t seem to affect Lightroom classic which is what I use.
评论 #34262387 未加载
ubermonkey超过 2 年前
Thanks for this post. I&#x27;ve just opted out.
sonu27超过 2 年前
This is actually ridiculous of them
kypro超过 2 年前
Specifically, what&#x27;s the issue here? Seems a lot of people are hating on Adobe here, but as far as I&#x27;m aware it&#x27;s fairly standard for companies to process your data to train their models. At least I see this kind of opt-in &#x2F; opt-out everywhere.<p>Is it that this is an opt-out not an opt-in, or is that it&#x27;s even an option to begin with?<p>If we as consumers want companies like Adobe to provide us with cool AI tools then it seems this is unfortunately just what&#x27;s required. And if you don&#x27;t like it, you can opt-out. So I&#x27;m guessing the issue is that it&#x27;s an opt-out not an opt-in? Which seems kinda minor and would perhaps violate GDPR in the EU.
评论 #34258537 未加载