TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A ChatGPT-authored article hit the front page of HN this morning

15 点作者 sigil超过 2 年前

3 条评论

dang超过 2 年前
For those who care: it&#x27;s <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=34287747" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=34287747</a>, and yes users noticed and flagged it.
senko超过 2 年前
Per author&#x27;s comment on the HN thread:<p>&gt; I am the person that wrote this, and used GPT-3 and a few other writing tools to help me wordsmith it. All the points, however, is original work and not AI generated. I am not a native English speaker, so I have been using these tools to avoid awkward sentences&#x2F;paragraphs.<p>How is this qualitatively different from using tools like Grammarly (which in their premium versions suggest style, not just grammar fixes) which themselves brag about being AI powered?<p>We&#x27;re not talking about &quot;write me an article about Foo&quot; - the author has provided detailed notes and presumably selected good-sounding output choices (they might be lying but that&#x27;s another issue).<p>Are we, software developers, founders and entrepreneurs, in the business of disrupting others and automating away their jobs with computers, now so outraged something like this can be successfully automated?<p>I have seen human copywriters producing much worse content than what ChatGPT does based on good prompts. Why on Earth should we not automate that?
评论 #34292941 未加载
tomxor超过 2 年前
It really doesn&#x27;t matter.<p>For some threads on HN the article headline works as a seed for discussion where we gain more value, then the content isn&#x27;t always that valuable human or GPT. For other&#x27;s where the content is more important, they simply wont get upvoted when it&#x27;s reconstituted garbage.
评论 #34291950 未加载
评论 #34291724 未加载
评论 #34291664 未加载