Some of my two cents:<p>* I don't really see the value-add of a curated list of what is already a curated list. Down the rabbit hole...<p>* The site's definition of what is included and what is excluded is <i>extremely</i> vague. "general news", "unique views", "interesting stuff". I mean come'on...<p>* At least HN has a relatively excellent definition of what counts as acceptable content (relative to other social media platform's definitions, which are deliberately vague to allow complete hegemonic content control).<p>* If I had a buck every time someone said "Hacker News needs to be more hacker and less news", only to realize that their definition of "hacker" and "news" was very unique to them and so supposing that there should be some filter to "objectively make HN better" was actually very subjective and of little use as a publicly available tool.<p>IMHO, this should have been a private tool of theirs. They could have probably achieved their subjective goal of "more hacker less news" with a little script to filter out HN posts for specific domains and keywords.