TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How I ruined my SEO

125 点作者 johnny_reilly超过 2 年前

25 条评论

vgeek超过 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.google.com&#x2F;search&#x2F;updates&#x2F;ranking" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.google.com&#x2F;search&#x2F;updates&#x2F;ranking</a><p>Your rankings tanking on&#x2F;around 10&#x2F;19&#x27;s update looks like a strong correlation. Your GSC with congruent drops in impressions and clicks doesn&#x27;t immediately look like KWs you were top 3 for suddenly dropping further down the page-- else impressions would be similar but AP&#x2F;CTR would just be tanking.<p>If you&#x27;re using GA and your traffic doesn&#x27;t have tons of seasonality, look at the landing page report month over month and see which pages have had the largest drop (can also do this in GSC). Then check in GSC and see what those pages&#x27; APs have done over the same period.<p>What types of links is GSC showing? Google says they don&#x27;t count bad links, but if they make up a large proportion of your site&#x27;s backlinks, SpamBrain (their spam AI-- publicly announced more frequently) may bucket your site that way.<p>SEMrush, ahrefs, Majestic, Moz OSE are all decent for checking who is linking (and maybe disavowing), but LinkResearchTools is probably going to focus more on identifying suspicious backlinks, if that is in fact what is impacting your site.
评论 #34391135 未加载
phphphphp超过 2 年前
Generally, if you make good changes, you&#x27;ll see a short-term dip before a long-term increase. The challenge is differentiating between bad changes that have caused long-term harm, vs. good changes that are experiencing the natural short-term dip.<p>A website may build good reputation with a search engine which has ranking benefits but at the core of search engine ranking is individual pages: you must protect your well ranking pages at all costs. That means <i>never break any links</i>. If you break links, your pages will drop out of search engines, and it can take years to rebuild the lost reputation for those pages. The model for thinking about SEO should be page-based, not website-based.<p>The good news is that if your website was able to rank well once, it&#x27;ll rank well again, because as much as we might tinker with the structure of a website, what matters most is the content, and you&#x27;re still distributing that same content... you just might have set yourself back a year by breaking a bunch of links. Easy mistake, c&#x27;est la vie.<p>The ideal strategy for experimenting with SEO is to do it page by page, experiment with different changes on different pages and measure the impact. Don&#x27;t make wholesale changes to the structure of every page until you&#x27;re confident that you&#x27;re doing something that works.
bmac27超过 2 年前
As others have said, this strikes me as a multi-faceted problem.<p>It&#x27;s possible Google devalues those sharing (even inadvertently!) GA tags in the rankings, although I don&#x27;t think there&#x27;s been any public proclamations from Google on that. But if that were the sole culprit, only your GA instance would reflect that. The fact that you&#x27;re losing real traffic (as reflected in what the 3rd party tools are telling you) makes me think that&#x27;s probably not the case&#x2F;or at least the only thing that&#x27;s happening.<p>Not implementing re-directs would also definitely be a culprit. But if it&#x27;s just images you failed to re-direct, that&#x27;s likely not the main thing either unless you were getting a majority of your traffic from Google Images.<p>Since this happened post-Core Update, I would want to know two things:<p>1. What keywords dropped and what replaced you 2. Whether the drop was site-wide or isolated to individual categories or groups of pages.<p>Regarding #1: Was what replaced you a big, high authority publisher? Or was the content simply more comprehensive or otherwise a better match for the user&#x27;s intent? Very likely could be E-E-A-T-related, in terms of the algos determining that you don&#x27;t have the authority&#x2F;expertise to rank for what you were ranking for previously.<p>Investigate those possibilities first and you should be able to better map out a plan for re-gaining that traffic.
评论 #34391337 未加载
评论 #34391334 未加载
supermatt超过 2 年前
&gt; As I&#x27;ve mentioned, I broke links by not implementing redirects.<p>Didnt implement redirects for what? The prior part of the article doesnt even mention you changed any page URLs.<p>But if you did, that is most definitely going to have caused problems.<p>Think about it - the pages are no longer there, so they will get dropped from the search index, so wont appear in search results, resulting in less impressions&#x2F;opportunities for click-through, and you will receive less visitors as a consequence.<p>You effectively delisted your sites content. The existing inbound links will now point to non-existent pages, so they carry no &quot;authority&quot; to your site. The content that is on the new URLs has no inherent &quot;authority&quot; so its not being ranked as well as it was on the old URLs. The search engines will rank it lower (e.g. page 10 instead of page 2), so less impressions and therefore less visitors.<p>You will likely be able to (partially) fix this with redirects - as sites that still link will still bring authority. But you will possibly have lost any history-based authority (that which comes from being a reliable and consistent URL), which may not be able to be retrieved.<p>I would recommend going through old access logs to find what your old URLs were, and redirect them to the new URLs for that same content (not a wildcard redirect to homepage!)
评论 #34390789 未加载
评论 #34390623 未加载
ApolloRising超过 2 年前
If you still need help and are really stuck ping me and I will try to help you sort this out quickly. Reply to this comment if you still need the help with an easy way to reach you via email. (Not asking for anything in return)
anon1094超过 2 年前
Johnny is correct and this most likely has to do with the 404 backlinks and accidental misuse of Google Analytics.<p>I recently did a comprehensive SEO audit for a web3 brand that saw a similar drastic drop in traffic. Here are some other things to keep in mind to rank better on Google.<p><pre><code> 1. One H1 per page </code></pre> SEO experts agree the best practice is to use one H1 per page. Headers help keep content structured for both Google and readers. If there are multiple H1s, convert them into proper H2-H4s to improve the content&#x27;s hierarchy.<p><pre><code> 2. High-quality content &gt;1000 words </code></pre> According to Yoast, chances of ranking in Google are higher if you write high-quality posts of 1000 words or more. If you have some sparse content that is less than this add a few more detailed sections.<p><pre><code> 3. Google PageSpeed score &gt;90 </code></pre> Google PageSpeed says that improving performance increases rankings and user experience. The ideal Google PageSpeed score is &gt;90. Make sure your pages takes less than 2s to load, and ideally less than 500ms. Reduce JS and additional requests on important pages.<p><pre><code> 4. Add title tags and meta descriptions with primary keyword </code></pre> Google recommends matching H1 tags to title tags to prevent inaccurate article titles from showing up on search results. It&#x27;s also best to include the primary keyword in the meta description too.<p><pre><code> 5. Improve primary blog page with multiple sections </code></pre> Your blog&#x27;s primary page is your chance to showcase your best content, not just an archive of your latest posts. Separate your posts into sections like best, classics, and latest. Add H1 to make it clear to the audience what the blog is about. Add H2 subheadline to clarify.<p>By the way Johnny, you can see the full SEO audit on my Twitter[0].<p>If you&#x27;re open to it, I&#x27;d love to do a full SEO audit for your blog. Let&#x27;s get those numbers back to their original state. Please DM me on Twitter.<p>P.S. - I worked with a software company[1] to build out their docs using Docusaurus so I&#x27;m familiar with how it works.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;dericksozo&#x2F;status&#x2F;1613171898430488578" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;dericksozo&#x2F;status&#x2F;1613171898430488578</a><p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;solidstateso&#x2F;shortcat-documentation-case-study-4b66b5f7a3c5" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;solidstateso&#x2F;shortcat-documentation-case-...</a>
评论 #34394527 未加载
评论 #34391550 未加载
z3t4超过 2 年前
Screw Google. Optimize your website for real humans. Then advertise it outside of Google, for example: have a link to your website in your profile.
评论 #34394566 未加载
评论 #34390412 未加载
the__alchemist超过 2 年前
Your site&#x27;s performance, reflected on its page speed insight score, is showing 45. This is unacceptable for a blog; it should be close to 100 for text-based pages like you have. Does the site contain scripts, deep dependency trees, or analytics?<p>Could this have changed during the performance drop?
评论 #34390904 未加载
评论 #34393868 未加载
jwie超过 2 年前
Google claims they don’t use GA for ranking signal. Though in your case it could be interpreted as mischief, maybe something is going on there. You might try recreating a GA4 instance and starting fresh. It might be the least painful road to redemption if that’s the issue.<p>Without knowing much about docusarus, if the upgrade touched the pages’ markup in some big way, something like not having h1 tags on the pages that would hurt.<p>The most likely culprit is a ranking algorithm change. I recall there was one around in October that wrecked more than a few sites.<p>The good news is you probably didn’t wreck your SEO. The bad news is you probably can’t do anything about it.
franze超过 2 年前
Confusing post for me.<p>Ad redirects? are we talking page URL redirects or just image URL redirects?<p>the GSC pattern looks a lot like page URLs changed. did they?<p>I would recommend to this kind of analysis <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fullstackoptimization.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;google-update" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fullstackoptimization.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;google-update</a><p>so basically<p>- did the page URLs change?<p>- 4 SEO tests<p>- and then winner&#x2F;loser pages analysis.<p>Update: 4 SEO tests are better outlined here <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fullstackoptimization.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;seo-basics" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fullstackoptimization.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;seo-basics</a>
评论 #34390579 未加载
chrismorgan超过 2 年前
Title:<p>&gt; <i>How I ruined my SEO</i><p>Conclusion:<p>&gt; <i>I&#x27;m not quite sure</i>
评论 #34390726 未加载
评论 #34390083 未加载
评论 #34390294 未加载
zuccs超过 2 年前
It&#x27;s your redirects causing duplicate content and&#x2F;or indexing issues.<p>Google&#x27;s index of your old site (excluding tags): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=site%3Ablog.johnnyreilly.com+-inurl%3A%2Ftags" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=site%3Ablog.johnnyreilly.com...</a><p>Shows your blog posts were indexed with no trailing slash: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;155" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;155</a><p>Your current 301 sends this to: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;155" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;155</a><p>Which doesn&#x27;t have a canonical tag, or 301 redirect, to the correct blog post: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;05&#x2F;20&#x2F;typescript-spare-rod-spoil-code" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;05&#x2F;20&#x2F;typescript-spare-rod-spo...</a><p>Once that&#x27;s fixed, I would also jump into GSC and run their Change of Address tool (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.google.com&#x2F;webmasters&#x2F;answer&#x2F;9370220?hl=en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.google.com&#x2F;webmasters&#x2F;answer&#x2F;9370220?hl=en</a>).<p>LMK if you need a hand with this.
lovasoa超过 2 年前
I don&#x27;t think sharing your Google analytics tag was the cause. If Google de-ranked unrelated sites using the same Google analytics id, we would see black-hat SEOs using that against their competitors. This ID isn&#x27;t a secret.
dceddia超过 2 年前
Of the things on the list, the redirects jumped out to me as the most likely culprit. Second guess would be the algorithm change. You could look at individual pages before &amp; after - mainly the top performing few, looking at what queries they ranked for before and now, and what their average position was. Hopefully the fix to the redirects will kick in soon!
PerilousD超过 2 年前
I gave up on following the Google SEO bandwagon years ago. I write for people and most definitely NOT for Google. I get around 800 real users a month on my site across about 20 countries - top 3 being U.S U.K and for some reason China. I get maybe 20 or so emails asking questions or just saying thanks and they have to track me down to send those emails there&#x27;s no &quot;email me&quot; link on the site. If you want to &quot;monetize&quot; your site then SEO away otherwise setup a Google site owner&#x2F;developer account for the &quot;advice&quot; (page not mobile friendly for example) but ignore the Googley crap unless you like running on THEIR treadmill.
Growtika超过 2 年前
With your approach I&#x27;m sure you&#x27;ll get back to normal traffic very soon.<p>I think your conclusion is right. It&#x27;s not one thing that cause the drop but a combination of things.<p>Let&#x27;s forget one sec about the traffic you had before and focus on the current situation.<p>- Page speed: It&#x27;s one of the most important ranking factor. You don&#x27;t have to get 100 score, but passing the core web vitals score and having higher score on mobile is recommended.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pagespeed.web.dev&#x2F;report?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyreilly.com%2F&amp;form_factor=mobile" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pagespeed.web.dev&#x2F;report?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyrei...</a><p>A cool trick to improve the result fast is by removing the lazy load effect from the LCP: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;rOOWm91.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;rOOWm91.png</a><p>- Add a robots.txt You have plenty of pages in the site, it might be good to make sure only things you want to be indexed are getting crawled. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;ONSiQjQ.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;ONSiQjQ.png</a><p>- Add bio (one liner) here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;SXbWVwU.jpg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;SXbWVwU.jpg</a> Great smile. The bio should show your readers your expertise in the topic. If you want to take it to the next level, Quora is a great inspiration. In every Quora answer you can write a different On-liner&#x2F;byline.<p>- Internal linking: I love your blog archive. It&#x27;s a great idea. Try to make more strategic articles stronger. More internal links to the article will signal search engines this page is indeed important.<p>- Add Privacy policy &amp; Terms of use pages<p>I can help you with analyzing the traffic drop if I&#x27;ll understand which pages were your largest traffic generators. Let&#x27;s try to understand what happened to those pages, and how it&#x27;s possible to make them stronger.<p>I worked with several large companies who had traffic drop after migration. Sometimes companies spend so much time and effort looking for the reason for the drop instead of just focus on recovering.<p>I&#x27;m up for analyzing the drop but if the reason is not obvious (Google Penalty for example), I recommend to focus on the future rather than the past.<p>I would love to help you (As a case study) with analyzing what caused the issue, and to give tips on how to move forward and get more traffic.<p>Edit: We wrote a SaaS SEO guide that cover several related topics: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;growtika.com&#x2F;saas-seo&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;growtika.com&#x2F;saas-seo&#x2F;</a>
评论 #34390430 未加载
评论 #34390234 未加载
评论 #34391399 未加载
评论 #34391367 未加载
评论 #34390341 未加载
评论 #34390552 未加载
remram超过 2 年前
Is there really no way to rotate your GA tag without creating a new property in Google Analytics? That seems like a glaring omission.
longtail_dragon超过 2 年前
Of the possibilities you listed in the article, my money is on the failure to do the redirects. Luckily, it may not be too late to fix that, if you haven&#x27;t already.<p>If you&#x27;re interested, email me at tobes@longtaildragon.com, and I&#x27;ll pull a report of every URL that needs a redirect.
for_i_in_range超过 2 年前
Seems like a lot of majoring in the minor here. After such an event, someone once told me to go fishing for a week and come back to focus on what really matters. It was helpful advice.
jcims超过 2 年前
Scott’s Cheap Flights just rebranded to Going. Would there be a good way for him to forecast the SEO impact of that change (which seems on the surface to be probably large)?
zsj888超过 2 年前
The other issue you may need pay attention to is your backlink profile. I ran an quick audit, 19% of your ahrefs links are bad. You probably need disavow them.
pmig超过 2 年前
Can Google Search Tool site verification via Google Analytics have played a role?<p>So all the new pages that use your tag get linked to your Google search tool property.
franze超过 2 年前
ok, as I was curious<p>this was your old site blog.johnnyreilly.com (note:hosted on on the blog subdomain) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=site%3Ablog.johnnyreilly.com&amp;pws=0&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=site%3Ablog.johnnyreilly.com...</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20230000000000*&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20230000000000*&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.joh...</a> archive.org picks it up until december 2022<p>this is your current site <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;</a> (note: no subdomain() <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=site%3Ajohnnyreilly.com&amp;pws=0&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=site%3Ajohnnyreilly.com&amp;pws=...</a> archive.org seems to pic it up late december 2022, start 2023 <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20230000000000*&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20230000000000*&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyre...</a><p>between old pages and new pages you have a redirect chain <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;201&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;201&#x2F;</a> -&gt; 301 -&gt; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;201&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;201&#x2F;</a> -&gt; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;201" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;201</a> final destination (which does not seem to be the correct new URL)<p>you had an domain movie, URL change and a subideal old 2 new migration if you do not want to loose traffic with URL changes, follwo this spec to the letter <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.google.com&#x2F;search&#x2F;docs&#x2F;crawling-indexing&#x2F;site-move-with-url-changes" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.google.com&#x2F;search&#x2F;docs&#x2F;crawling-indexing&#x2F;...</a><p>if you do not do this correctly a traffic pattern like yours must be expected.<p>if you do this now you might be abble to recup about 50% of your old traffic, might<p>additionally you haver massive self made internal duplicate content (tag pages show full pages), soft 404 (non existing pages i.e.: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;fake-url-for-soft-404-error-check-8032439845" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;johnnyreilly.com&#x2F;page&#x2F;fake-url-for-soft-404-error-ch...</a> trigger HTTP 302 redirects and then even more behaviour)
评论 #34391201 未加载
pictur超过 2 年前
Does anyone have a guideline for seo? Is doing the basics enough or is there something that creates magic?
orangepurple超过 2 年前
No privacy policy and no terms of service might do it
评论 #34390092 未加载
评论 #34390181 未加载
评论 #34394043 未加载