TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: What is the latest in Configuration Management?

1 点作者 bittermandel超过 2 年前
I haven&#x27;t worked in Infrastructure teams since 2016. At that point I worked with migrating CFEngine to Ansible&#x2F;Puppet&#x2F;Saltstack, all of which seem to still be alive (although Puppet less so).<p>Has configuration management really died out since then? Seems like nothing new is happening, outside of VMWare acquiring Saltstack and fully open-sourcing it under Salt Project.<p>Any news?

1 comment

bradwood超过 2 年前
If you are managing servers, and they all have different builds, then sure, it&#x27;s still around.<p>But most people these days (bar some exceptional special cases) are doing immutable infrastructure with homegeneous builds (usually in the cloud, or on some kind of virtualisation infrastructure).<p>For example, building k8s nodes might be done with Packer and Terraform these days, rather than Ansible&#x2F;Puppet&#x2F;Saltstack. These hosts are designed to be largely (if not completely) identical, so configuration management at the host level becomes more about images and less about post-build configuration management.<p>What used to live in host-oriented config management, therefore, is now pushed up the stack into containers (which are built in container pipelines) and managed at this level of abstraction. Think walls of k8s yaml, or docker compose files, or similar.<p>This is for cases where servers actually need to be managed, but even this is becoming rarer with the advent of serverless and managed services (in, say, AWS, for example) where you, as the user of the service, doesn&#x27;t get to log into the host providing the service.