TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Twitter TOS Change

106 点作者 archb超过 2 年前

11 条评论

phnofive超过 2 年前
Seems to be the only big change - this was added to a list of &#x27;thou shalt not&#x27;s:<p>&quot;use or access the Licensed Materials to create or attempt to create a substitute or similar service or product to the Twitter Applications&quot;<p>Goodbye, nitter(?)
评论 #34450615 未加载
评论 #34450992 未加载
评论 #34449450 未加载
评论 #34449380 未加载
评论 #34451176 未加载
rsolva超过 2 年前
Another walled garden closing up holes in the fence. I understand the reasoning from an advertise-driven business perspective, but it won&#x27;t help Twitter in the long run. Many of their power users providing engaging content will seek out other venues to interact with their audience on their own terms.<p>I already see many of them having a great time in the Fediverse and new apps and tools are popping up like mushrooms, providing a much more compelling and diverse ecosystem. Give it a few years and I predict many more have grown sceptical towards platforms that eventually change for the worse, and has sought out more open systems.
nothrowaways超过 2 年前
Diffchecker is such an interesting tool. It should be integrated with every TOS
评论 #34452457 未加载
ronreiter超过 2 年前
As much as it sucks, YouTube has the same clause and it makes a lot of sense for companies who monetize on ads.<p>The fact that it was like that until now was bad for Twitter’s revenue.
评论 #34450551 未加载
评论 #34450729 未加载
评论 #34450999 未加载
0xy超过 2 年前
Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Snapchat and TikTok all forbid third party clients.<p>The only outlier, Reddit, is massively unprofitable.<p>You can&#x27;t run an advertising business while inviting competitors to use your content for free.
评论 #34451456 未加载
评论 #34453926 未加载
评论 #34455565 未加载
评论 #34457583 未加载
评论 #34450540 未加载
评论 #34455015 未加载
评论 #34454075 未加载
评论 #34450541 未加载
评论 #34452648 未加载
MadVikingGod超过 2 年前
Twitter: We are going to ban 3rd party apps because of a long standing rule.<p>(tomorrow)<p>Twitter: Oh hey, we have a minor update to our TOS.
tomcam超过 2 年前
Shout out to diffchecker, which I didn’t know about. Perfect UI.
评论 #34450897 未加载
anthk超过 2 年前
Back in the day <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;m.twitter.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;m.twitter.com</a> worked great everywhere: Lynx, Links, Dillo, Emacs, a toaster, everwyhere. Even under low bw places. Now Twtr&#x27;s turd without Ublock Origin it&#x27;s unusable. Also, no JSless clients, so bye legacy users with underpowered smartphones and desktops&#x2F;laptops.
phnofive超过 2 年前
Curiously, this tool was most recently submitted for a previous Twitter TOS change about eight months ago; it prompted a lively discussion:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=31351013" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=31351013</a>
fatfox超过 2 年前
It couldn’t be more explicit: no more 3rd party Twitter clients.
MisterBastahrd超过 2 年前
I don&#x27;t think this is Musk being tyrannical as much as him being afraid that he&#x27;s losing ad revenue.