TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

“Pigeon Neck” Illusion (2014)

344 点作者 mnem超过 2 年前

13 条评论

newaccount74超过 2 年前
Here&#x27;s my attempt at explaining this phenomenon:<p>Our Retinas don&#x27;t send raw data to our brain like a camera sensor would. Instead, the neurons in the retina already do some pre-processing, like boundary detection, or movement detection. The brain then receives signals where movement was detected.<p>This movement detection is basically just detecting changes in light level, so it works better when the contrast is high (dark gray vs. white) and works less good when contrast is low (dark grey vs black).<p>So our brain gets stronger &quot;movement&quot; signals when there is high contrast, and it looks like the part that has high contrast is moving faster. Since the image is designed in a way that the boundary of head&#x2F;body always have low&#x2F;high contrast or vice versa, it seems they are moving with different speeds.
albert_e超过 2 年前
The illusion was very strong on my mobile screen and non-existent on my desktop screen. The screen calibration was different in the latter I believe so the pigeons were appearing as a slightly different colored grey blocks visually distinct from the vertical bars.
评论 #34556758 未加载
dawatchusay超过 2 年前
I don’t feel this is much of an illusion. I think you just can’t see the movement of gray on black. Or maybe this is what illusions are in a very simple form?
评论 #34554352 未加载
评论 #34554047 未加载
评论 #34554360 未加载
评论 #34554012 未加载
评论 #34554204 未加载
评论 #34553901 未加载
评论 #34556383 未加载
d4mi3n超过 2 年前
I was in bed reading this with an eye closed and was very confused until I discovered the illusion works for me only when I watch it with both eyes open.<p>I found this surprising—I know three dimensional optical illusions depend on focus and perspective, but I was unaware two dimensional optical illusions were as well.
评论 #34554384 未加载
评论 #34555357 未加载
评论 #34554820 未加载
评论 #34554411 未加载
评论 #34556111 未加载
评论 #34556188 未加载
illegalmemory超过 2 年前
It would have been interesting to control the width of the vertical stripes too , to see at what point it &quot;starts&quot; being a illusion. I assume for very thin stripes it might not work so well .
userbinator超过 2 年前
This seems to be, for lack of a better analogy, an effect of rounding colour intensities in the &quot;motion compensation&quot; processing of the brain. The grey and black become perceived as identical and thus no motion is detected in those areas where the two colours are overlapping.
xwdv超过 2 年前
Jesus, this illusion is so powerful, you’d have to have a very poorly optimized brain to really see anything else.
评论 #34554156 未加载
评论 #34554427 未加载
评论 #34553914 未加载
评论 #34553938 未加载
评论 #34553968 未加载
评论 #34556121 未加载
评论 #34555615 未加载
评论 #34555087 未加载
评论 #34554583 未加载
sorokod超过 2 年前
I wonder what is the maximal extent of the craining and the shrinking illusion that can be achieved. Is it to do with the velocity? The grid thiknes?<p>If the illusion is an error, what maximizes it?
aliqot超过 2 年前
I get what I&#x27;m supoosed to see but i dont see it, its pixels gliding continuously.
zestyping超过 2 年前
This isn&#x27;t an illusion at all. Things that are too dark to see... are too dark to see.<p>Nothing to see here, move along.
clhodapp超过 2 年前
Something I noticed and got a kick from: If you set the color to black or white then the real motion and the illusion are indistinguishable.
tolmasky超过 2 年前
Hey, this is built with Cappuccino!
bella_sm超过 2 年前
DaVinci would have loved this!