TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Berkeley Mono Ligatures Release

158 点作者 nullchan超过 2 年前

21 条评论

AJRF超过 2 年前
I paid for this font. I can&#x27;t believe it, but I just kept coming back to the webpage every week thinking &quot;Aww dang its nice, but no way would I ever pay $75 for a font for personal use&quot;.<p>But I kept coming back. Again and again, just looking through their page. I tried the trial. I eventually caved. A weird moment for me, but I bloody love this font and I frequently notice how nice it is in all my IDEs.<p>I sound like a shill, sorry.
评论 #34587533 未加载
评论 #34588312 未加载
评论 #34586996 未加载
评论 #34589895 未加载
评论 #34587242 未加载
评论 #34589036 未加载
评论 #34587972 未加载
评论 #34588804 未加载
amake超过 2 年前
To all the people complaining about how they don&#x27;t like ligatures:<p>Nobody cares. If you don&#x27;t like them, then don&#x27;t use them. They are optional.<p>Lots of people like them. Let people like things.
评论 #34590652 未加载
评论 #34589747 未加载
iaabtpbtpnn超过 2 年前
Judging by the other replies I must be alone here, but I can&#x27;t stand these ligatures. I don&#x27;t even like them on blog posts, especially that awful ostentatious s-t ligature (nobody writes like that!). But in that context I can tolerate the whimsy. For a fixed-width programming font, though? Where individual characters frequently completely modify the meaning of a statement? The absolute <i>last</i> thing I want is for <i>any</i> of the characters to be obfuscated. I want to see exactly the symbols that I can type on my keyboard to reproduce the text, not some typographer&#x27;s notion of good aesthetics.
Pinus超过 2 年前
It is sometimes said, that nostalgia is not the yearning for the past as it actually was, but for the past as it exists in our rosiest memories. I seem to have taken this one step further — I yearn for a world which I never experienced, and which possibly never existed except in my fantasy at the time. I was born in 1971. By the time I was aware of computers, but still a child, in the late 1970’s to the mid 1980’s, my image of computers — real computers, the sort that flew you to the moon or ran large companies or research labs, not the Z80 basic-in-ROM “home computer” we actually had at home — was formed by whatever reading matter was around, most of it outdated even at the time. This was Apollo-era spaceflight. It was 9-track open-reel tape stations and chain printers. It was Frutiger and Univers.<p>Obviously, many of the things my parents used were from the 1960’s or 1970’s, so that is what serious stuff for grown-ups looked like. (This condition could be hereditary. I have no children, but if I had, they would be exposed to things like my DSLR and stereo amp, both older than they would have been.)<p>I think this is what makes me like the aesthetics of this typeface so much. It is not what computers used to look like, what they look like today, or what they will look like tomorrow. It is what they were supposed to look like!
TacticalCoder超过 2 年前
Regarding fonts, here&#x27;s one that makes me sad... The ASCII vertical bar (the &quot;pipe&quot; symbol) used to be a &quot;broken bar&quot;, making it very clear it wasn&#x27;t an uppercase &quot;I&quot; or a lowercase &quot;l&quot; or even a &quot;1&quot; (in some old or stylized font).<p>I really like a broken vertical bar. There&#x27;s been a fight, where it became a solid vertical bar, then a broken vertical bar again, then a solid bar again:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Vertical_bar" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Vertical_bar</a><p>See the <i>&quot;Solid vertical bar vs broken bar&quot;</i> section.<p>Because mathematical &quot;OR&quot; and all that IIUC. But I don&#x27;t care. I&#x27;m in control. So my monospace font use a broken vertical bar (and a taller one than what&#x27;s usually seen too, there&#x27;s no risk of mistaking my &quot;broken bar&quot; &#x27;|&#x27; with &#x27;!&#x27;). When I write &quot;my&quot; font, it&#x27;s literally a font I made myself by using FontForge slightly modifying another font (I basically modified @$%&amp;|l and a few other tiny details). I cannot distribute it though.<p>EDIT: funnily enough reading that Wikipedia article I posted, I checked my keyboards... Two of them, an old IBM Model M and a &quot;not so old but still old&quot; Sun keyboard do both have a broken bar printed as the vertical bar: I never realized that!
评论 #34589384 未加载
Egoist超过 2 年前
I absolutely love Berkeley Mono and the author’s efforts into perfecting the font. It has been my favorite font since it was first released. Some fonts don’t go beyond the initial release for fixing minor issues, so I appreciate these updates. While I understand that Ligatures are controversial, it’s still good to add the option for people who likes it.<p>In another note, I really enjoy the simplicity in the website design.
chilie超过 2 年前
Am I alone in disliking ligatures? I want a font that displays the characters I type in exactly the form I type them. I really don&#x27;t see the appeal.
评论 #34589428 未加载
评论 #34589666 未加载
评论 #34589316 未加载
评论 #34589123 未加载
dang超过 2 年前
Related:<p><i>Berkeley Mono v1.008 Released</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33614114" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33614114</a> - Nov 2022 (2 comments)<p><i>Show HN: Berkeley Mono Typeface</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=30557557" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=30557557</a> - March 2022 (171 comments)
kubectl_h超过 2 年前
Berkeley Mono is my favorite programming font (happy paying customer) and Berkley Mono(filament) is my go to cheap fishing line. Anytime I see a link or get a rare update email from the former it takes me a second to realize it&#x27;s not about the latter.
whalesalad超过 2 年前
If you want excellent ligature support I would recommend Fira Mono. There are powerline variants, too. Lately I have been in love with IBM Plex Mono, but no ligature support.
评论 #34589877 未加载
评论 #34592106 未加载
x3n0ph3n3超过 2 年前
Also a big fan of Victor Mono. I&#x27;ve found ligatures to be quite satisfying when programming.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rubjo.github.io&#x2F;victor-mono&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rubjo.github.io&#x2F;victor-mono&#x2F;</a>
Redoubts超过 2 年前
&gt; DO NOT OPERATE ON CRITICAL CODE WITH THE TRIAL FONT. WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES TO YOUR MAINFRAME SYSTEM OR OTHERWISE.<p>The styling on this site is so neat
scns超过 2 年前
I think it looks great, and decided to check out how my favourite font (Fira Code) stacks up [0].<p>Hate to poop on others hard work, but i think Fira Code looks much better. The missing one i found might be critical for Clojurists, could be patched in FC.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;gallery&#x2F;OzcOgq5" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;gallery&#x2F;OzcOgq5</a>
wyager超过 2 年前
That &lt;|&gt; looks great!
seanhunter超过 2 年前
I love Berkeley Mono and have been using it as my main font for some time. I’m in two minds about using the ligatures version because I’m not completely crazy about ligatures in general, but this font is just a fantastic monospace font for general use. I can heartily recommend it.
jswny超过 2 年前
With a paid font like this, what’s the story for supporting Nerd front icons and power line icons?
评论 #34590016 未加载
评论 #34589158 未加载
nice_byte超过 2 年前
this looks sick, I might actually give in and swap the IBM VGA bitmap font I use everywhere for this...
评论 #34588328 未加载
nix23超过 2 年前
Go to the &quot;Ligatures Explorer&quot; and choose Clojure ;)
scns超过 2 年前
Where is Waldo on that page?
TheDesolate0超过 2 年前
My font already has ligature support for coding.<p>What does this font offer in support for unicode glyphs?
smlacy超过 2 年前
Signed up for the &quot;free trial&quot; font (for personal use) and was particularly disappointed by this:<p><pre><code> Please note that the trial version has the following limitations: * Limited to ASCII-128 character set * Missing &#x27;7&#x27; and &#x27;S&#x27; glyphs * Swapped: &#x27;&#x2F;&#x27; and &#x27;\&#x27;, &#x27;\*&#x27; and &#x27;#&#x27;</code></pre>
评论 #34590478 未加载