TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: LinkedIn sent me a cease and desist for my Chrome extension. Help?

225 点作者 namukang超过 2 年前
Hi HN,<p>I&#x27;m the creator and solo developer behind Browserflow, a Chrome extension that lets you automate any website. (Show HN from around a year ago: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=29254147). Basically, it&#x27;s a general-purpose browser automation tool like Selenium&#x2F;Puppeteer&#x2F;Playwright that anyone can use without writing code.<p>The Browserflow website includes examples of automations people often request, including scraping popular websites like LinkedIn. A few days ago, I received a cease and desist letter from LinkedIn: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;browserflow.app&#x2F;linkedin.pdf<p>As a one-man operation with modest resources, I&#x27;m hoping I can get some help from the HN community in understanding what this means to avoid getting sued into oblivion. :)<p>At first I thought that I&#x27;d be fine if I removed all references to LinkedIn from the Browserflow website, but I&#x27;m not so sure about that. One of LinkedIn&#x27;s demands is to “Cease and desist developing, offering, or using software or programs with features developed, marketed, or intended for automating activity on LinkedIn’s website or app, scraping LinkedIn member data, or otherwise violating the LinkedIn User Agreement”.<p>Even if I removed all the LinkedIn examples, Browserflow could still be used to automate or scrape LinkedIn because, well, it&#x27;s a browser automation tool. Is LinkedIn demanding that I stop developing Browserflow altogether?<p>The letter cites hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp as the legal precedent for why Browserflow is in violation, but there are some differences between hiQ and Browserflow that I thought might be meaningful:<p>1. Browserflow is not designed specifically for scraping LinkedIn: It&#x27;s a tool for general-purpose browser automation, not a service that scrapes LinkedIn and resells the data.<p>2. Browserflow does not scrape LinkedIn on its own: Any automation of LinkedIn is initiated by the user using their own LinkedIn account.<p>2. Browserflow does not create or use fake LinkedIn accounts.<p>I&#x27;d be fine with removing all the LinkedIn examples from the website, but I&#x27;d like to continue building Browserflow because I love working on it and it&#x27;s my livelihood. I&#x27;d appreciate any advice or help. Thanks!

47 条评论

onion2k超过 2 年前
To be fair to LinkedIn they do list a specific and limited set of problems in their letter. They&#x27;re not asking you to stop building BrowserFlow, but to stop advertising it as a LinkedIn scraping tool, and using their logo to do that. It sounds to me (not a lawyer) that removing all the LinkedIn examples from your website and stopping using their logo would be enough to satisfy their request...
评论 #34584741 未加载
评论 #34585111 未加载
评论 #34584973 未加载
评论 #34584933 未加载
riverlong超过 2 年前
This is not legal advice, but here&#x27;s what I would do:<p>1. Recognize that they have requested exactly four specific actions from you (bullet points, second page)<p>2. Do not follow the 4th bullet point, affirming in writing any future conduct only opens you up to liability. (By affirming, you&#x27;d create some agreement that they could later make hay about you breaching if they&#x27;re not happy with your future conduct.)<p>3. Follow the 3rd bullet point rigorously. They do have a claim on Trademark infringement, and that will hold up well enough. Clean it up ASAP.<p>4. Take a legal position on where you stand vis-a-vis the LinkedIn User Agreement.<p>- BrowserFlow (or Road to Ramen LLC) is not a party to that agreement, so you can argue that you&#x27;re not bound by it. The individual person who is <i>using</i> BrowserFlow is, since they have a LinkedIn account.<p>- If you want to play it safe, remove the LinkedIn examples from your website. (Bullet two.)<p>- I would not change the existing functionality of BrowserFlow -- my view here is that this is general-purpose tech and BrowserFlow doesn&#x27;t have an agreement with LinkedIn. Any consequence of misuse of BrowserFlow is on the end-user, not you. (As spelled out by the terms at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;browserflow.app&#x2F;terms" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;browserflow.app&#x2F;terms</a>, which contain a limitation of liability section.)<p>Do prepare for your LinkedIn account to be banned though.
评论 #34585274 未加载
评论 #34585341 未加载
belval超过 2 年前
Not a lawyer but:<p>&gt; Cease and desist developing, offering, or using software or programs with features developed, marketed, or intended for automating activity on LinkedIn’s website or app, scraping LinkedIn member data, or otherwise violating the LinkedIn User Agreement;<p>&gt; Cease and desist marketing or advertising Browserflow as a tool or service to be used in a manner that violates LinkedIn’s User Agreement, or promoting Browserflow in any way that represents or suggests functionality or features that can be used to violate LinkedIn’s User Agreement;<p>&gt; Cease and desist violating LinkedIn’s intellectual property rights by removing from all Browserflow materials all unauthorized uses of logos likely to cause confusion with LinkedIn’s trademark; and<p>&gt; Affirm in writing that you will not engage in any violations of the LinkedIn User Agreement in the future.<p>Just remove all LinkedIn examples and tell them you will stop marketing it as a LinkedIn scraping tool in the future. I don&#x27;t know your extension if you make any &quot;significant&quot; money then get a real lawyer to look it over.
评论 #34584617 未加载
评论 #34584810 未加载
评论 #34585097 未加载
评论 #34584845 未加载
评论 #34585042 未加载
评论 #34598494 未加载
bityard超过 2 年前
&gt; but I&#x27;d like to continue building Browserflow because it&#x27;s my livelihood<p>You&#x27;re asking random internet weirdos for business legal advice when you should definitely be contacting your lawyer instead.
评论 #34584307 未加载
评论 #34586724 未加载
verdverm超过 2 年前
1) Talk to a lawyer, many will do an initial consultation for free. Expect to pay money to have them help you with response letters. I would not recommend doing this alone<p>2) It does sound like your app is more general, like you say, similar to browser automation tools or AutoHotKey. The user requests are not coming from an IP you control. Remove references &#x2F; examples to LinkedIn for sure. This is basically what they are asking you to do. Talk to a lawyer<p>Side note, I thought LinkedIn lost that case on appeal, and after being sent back down from the Supreme Court for re-evaluation.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.zdnet.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;court-rules-that-data-scraping-is-legal-in-linkedin-appeal&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.zdnet.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;court-rules-that-data-scraping...</a>
评论 #34585343 未加载
评论 #34590668 未加载
phphphphp超过 2 年前
A big part of LinkedIn&#x27;s business is providing tools for recruiters to search the database of profiles and extract information, essentially, your extension is compromising their core revenue-generating product and you&#x27;re loudly announcing it on your website. I am not a lawyer so take this with a grain of salt, but if you remove all reference to LinkedIn from your website immediately (and maybe go as far as blocking it for use on LinkedIn) you should be fine.<p>And for future reference, be very careful when promoting the way that people are using your product: plausible deniability is your friend.
评论 #34585542 未加载
henryfjordan超过 2 年前
IANAL. You probably should get a lawyer ASAP.<p>Linkedin vs hiQ was about the ability to scrape public data. (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calawyers.org&#x2F;privacy-law&#x2F;ninth-circuit-holds-data-scraping-is-legal-in-hiq-v-linkedin&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calawyers.org&#x2F;privacy-law&#x2F;ninth-circuit-holds-data-s...</a>)<p>Pretty much everyone agrees that you need to follow the Linkedin terms if you are logged in, and those say no scraping. Your site has examples of scraping data from logged-in pages.<p>Normally you could say &quot;it&#x27;s just a tool, there are legit uses, go after the users&quot;, like in the Betamax case: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios,_Inc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Unive...</a>.<p>By including examples of breaking the Linkedin ToS on your site though, you might have opened yourself up to some kind of claim, maybe tortuous interference. I don&#x27;t really know though, you should get a lawyer to look for you.<p>Again, I am not a lawyer, do not trust me, I am just some idiot who likes to read about copyright law about the internet on the internet. Get your own lawyer.
评论 #34584670 未加载
clint超过 2 年前
If its your livelihood, hire a lawyer to look into this. The dweebs on this forum are not going to be able to help you here.
评论 #34584427 未加载
tenebrisalietum超过 2 年前
Not a lawyer.<p>Showing people examples of a website really looks like you&#x27;re advertising that your extension will work with that site, and it&#x27;s probably not too far from successfully arguing intent. So begin by getting rid of that.<p>Maybe add a couple disclaimers:<p>&quot;The terms of service of some websites do not allow automated workflows. This extension is not intended to be used to collect data in contradiction to a site&#x27;s Terms of Service. Please thoroughly read and understand the site&#x27;s Terms of Service before using this extension. [Developer] cannot assume any responsbility for any action a website may take against you or your account as a result of the use of this tool.&quot;
localhost3000超过 2 年前
A few years ago I got multiple cease and desist emails from a FAANG for a Chrome extension they didn&#x27;t like. I ignored them and they eventually went away. Sending scary sounding emails to indie devs is extremely low cost.
评论 #34585269 未加载
tptacek超过 2 年前
Seems like a pretty simple thing you can do here is just remove any mention of LinkedIn from your product and its marketing. People can use a generic tool to mess with LinkedIn, but that&#x27;s not your problem, and it&#x27;s not what the C&amp;D is saying. You went out of your way to market your extension as a tool for messing with LinkedIn in ways their user agreement prohibits. Consider just not poking the bear anymore.<p>I would talk to a lawyer before sending them a written response, but you probably don&#x27;t need legal advice just to scrape LinkedIn out of your product materials.
lesuorac超过 2 年前
&gt; As the Court in hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp. found when it granted LinkedIn summary judgment against hiQ [1] ...<p>Keep in mind, LinkedIn ultimately lost that case [2]<p>&gt; LinkedIn requires that you affirm that you have complied with LinkedIn’s requests, listed above, by February 10, 2023 ... In the event you do not comply with LinkedIn’s requests, LinkedIn will take appropriate action to protect its members and platform.<p>Definitely listen to the rest of the people who are saying talk to a lawyer. LinkedIn has obviously been doing the same in the interim; it&#x27;d be foolish to be the only side unprepared.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;browserflow.app&#x2F;linkedin.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;browserflow.app&#x2F;linkedin.pdf</a> [2]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn</a>
评论 #34585740 未加载
blantonl超过 2 年前
You have should do the following immediately<p>1) Take down this post. LinkedIn&#x27;s lawyers will almost certainly eventually read it and use whatever you&#x27;ve said here against you<p>2) Get an IP&#x2F;Copyright lawyer and start following their instructions<p>This is really your only set of actions you should take if this extension is your &quot;livelihood&quot;
samstave超过 2 年前
Linked in can get fucked ;<p>&quot;<i>Cease and desist developing, offering, or using software or programs with features developed, marketed, or intended for automating activity on LinkedIn’s website or app, scraping LinkedIn member data</i>&quot;<p>-<p>Then let me see exactly to whom you have been selling MY user data to, how much you made from it.<p>THEY need a cease and desist - because you are directly competing with their business model.<p>Fuck linkedin.<p>If you want anyone to stop scraping data, then you need to provide a dashboard to EVERY single linkedin user on exactly how linkedin has been using their PII to profit.<p>We need a change in the way people regard PII in silicon valley.<p>Just like it was stated - the only reason silicon valley is going after TikTok ban, is they cant compete with TikTok - so BAN them....<p>Linkedin does <i>exactly</i> what you are doing, thus they want you to cease and desist.
siegel超过 2 年前
As an attorney who deals with responding to (and, well, also drafting) letters like this, I think LinkedIn may very well go away if you remove any reference to LinkedIn from your website and otherwise refrain from stating or implying that your tool can be used to scrape LinkedIn.<p>If you are ok with that, a carefully drafted response letter that shows that you take their concerns seriously and are taking steps to effect the above changes might end this. At a minimum, you&#x27;ll be able to get clarity as to whether they want more that just stop referencing them.
Awelton超过 2 年前
I can scrape linkedin with a python script. That doesn&#x27;t mean linkedin can shut down python. I would think removing all the references to their company in particular would be enough for them to call off the dogs. For clarity, I am not a lawyer and I have thrown away every cease and desist I have ever received with no repercussions at all. You may not be so lucky and should probably talk to a lawyer.
评论 #34607139 未加载
indymike超过 2 年前
&gt; Even if I removed all the LinkedIn examples, Browserflow could still be used to automate or scrape LinkedIn because, well, it&#x27;s a browser automation tool. Is LinkedIn demanding that I stop developing Browserflow altogether?<p>First, talk to a lawyer. LinkedIn is highly litigious about scraping, and browser plugins often fall in that category. The law isn&#x27;t settled on the issue at all, and here&#x27;s a law firm (Farella Braun + Martel) article about HiQ vs LinkedIn from just a few weeks ago: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fbm.com&#x2F;publications&#x2F;what-recent-rulings-in-hiq-v-linkedin-and-other-cases-say-about-the-legality-of-data-scraping&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fbm.com&#x2F;publications&#x2F;what-recent-rulings-in-hiq-...</a>
csydas超过 2 年前
As people have said, just contact a lawyer willing to provide a consultation, and likely take their services to get assistance in addressing a response.<p>You have time to get a consultation and draft a response; the language in use is overly broad in the letter and intentionally so. This is to be rebutted and basically tell them &quot;you will stop advertising that it _can_ scrape LinkedIn, but LinkedIn cannot outright ban any tool that might be used for scraping as that&#x27;s not their right.&quot; A real attorney will write this in a very nice way with proper wording that you will stop advertising that it can scape LinkedIn but they can stuff the other parts of the demands wherever is convenient for them.<p>It will cost a bit of money regrettably, but it should be manageable.
freediver超过 2 年前
Get legal advice.<p>It is not clear how is it that your company is violating their user agreement, when it is the users using the extension that are. The extension on its own does nothing? This is my very layman reaction and first thing I would seek to understand better from legal council.
Dr_ReD超过 2 年前
- not a lawyer here -<p>I&#x27;d immediately remove every reference to linkedin -anywhere- and hard-block their domain in the code. Only after, I&#x27;d probably seek a release from the injunction.<p>Perhaps you should involve a lawyer, but if you won&#x27;t, then limit yourself to a brief matter of fact explanation of what you&#x27;ve changed, focusing especially on the block in the source code. Do not address their points yourself. Refrain from <i>any</i> commentary, apologies, admissions.<p>I wouldn&#x27;t go any further without a lawyer.
10g1k超过 2 年前
The fact that a &quot;cease &amp; desist&quot; or &quot;terms &amp; conditions&quot; exists doesn&#x27;t necessarily mean anything. It does not automatically, intrinsically carry legal weight or meaning of any sort. Any random person can put a &quot;licence&quot; or T&amp;C page on their website, or send an email with a couple of supposedly legal terms in it, but that doesn&#x27;t mean anything.<p>For example (assuming they can actually construct a prosecutable legal case), if you are outside the claimant&#x27;s and any related court&#x27;s jurisdiction, you just don&#x27;t need to give a **. The worst they will ever be able to do to you is disable your account.
forgotpwd16超过 2 年前
You aren&#x27;t (edit: though saw others say you provide examples of scraping on site so <i>you</i> may be) in violation of user agreement (since as you say it&#x27;s a tool rather a user) but you&#x27;re in trademark violation if you indeed use LinkedIn&#x27;s logo.<p>&gt;Even if I removed all the LinkedIn examples, Browserflow could still be used to automate or scrape LinkedIn because<p>Technically you can block it from being used on LinkedIn. But all they ask is not advertise that can do it. (And remove any trademarks of course.)
评论 #34585242 未加载
EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK超过 2 年前
Scraping is a grey area - nobody likes their site being worked by bots, except maybe by Google! Even if other companies you advertise didn&#x27;t send you letters yet, they will, once your product starts being popular and they notice an uptick in unproductive traffic. I&#x27;d advertise it as an automation tool only, without any concrete examples. And maybe create an &quot;unaffiliated&quot; forum site where users share their own scripts that just happen to scrape this or that ...
mattlondon超过 2 年前
Without a lawyer (get a lawyer!) I would remove all references to linked in and add an exception to the extension that prevents it working on linked in (perhaps display a message with a link to the cease and desist message).<p>I wouldn&#x27;t bother trying to fight it as a one-person operation. Just accept that life is unfair and carry on. Unless that is you feel very strongly about it and am prepared to sacrifice yourself and future income and potentially employment prospects for the cause.<p>Good luck.
david422超过 2 年前
I received a cease and desist letter from a company at one point. After the initial shock, I was able to just work with them with what they wanted - a name change and terms added to my product that indicated that I was not associated with them in any way.<p>It was easier than me hiring a lawyer and&#x2F;or fighting them in court or wherever that would have lead to. And allowed me to keep doing my development. YMMV
EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK超过 2 年前
Scraping is a grey area, even if other companies you advertise how to scrape didn&#x27;t send you letters yet, they will once your product starts being popular. I&#x27;d advertise it as automation tool only, without any concrete examples. And maybe create an &quot;unaffiliated&quot; forum site where users share their own scripts that just happen to scrape this or that ...
kevin_thibedeau超过 2 年前
It&#x27;s high time for lawyers acting in bad faith to be slapped down. In your response make sure to cite the relevant barratry statutes.
Zamicol超过 2 年前
For all the legal people here, what&#x27;s the legality of something like &quot;Return YouTube Dislike&quot;? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;detail&#x2F;return-youtube-dislike&#x2F;gebbhagfogifgggkldgodflihgfeippi" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;detail&#x2F;return-youtube-dis...</a>
grundoon超过 2 年前
&quot;I&#x27;d be fine with removing all the LinkedIn examples from the website, but I&#x27;d like to continue building Browserflow...&quot; -- my advice is to do just that. IANAL but you will be in the right (not always the same as being on the right side of the law, but more important imo).
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF超过 2 年前
You absolutely want to find legal representation and ask them. Point out the things you pointed out in this post and ask what they think. Beyond that, I would hesitate to advise. Heed the advice of your legal counsel; find legal counsel if you have not already.
paulschreiber超过 2 年前
The EFF can help. Send an email to info@eff.org and say you want some Coders Rights advice.
armatav超过 2 年前
Go look at Proxycurl - they’ve been scraping LinkedIn for ages; have a lawyer look it over.
npteljes超过 2 年前
I&#x27;d remove the LinkedIn examples first. And then regain some of the LinkedIn exposure by astroturfing blog posts, YouTube videos, etc that show how to use Browserflow to scrape LinkedIn. While NOT connecting these two in any other way.
apienx超过 2 年前
Remove all mentions of LinkedIn, logos, links and examples ASAP. Don&#x27;t fight it.
krono超过 2 年前
That&#x27;s rich coming from a subsidiary of the company behind copypilot (which would of course be Microsoft)!<p>Hopefully you manage to get out of this with your project still relatively intact and yourself otherwise unscathed.
heresjohnny超过 2 年前
You’re using logos and trademarks of various companies in the context of helping people to violate ToS. The fact that only LinkedIn has reached out so far is quite interesting. I would expect more letters.
Maursault超过 2 年前
Remove all examples and ban LinkedIn in your code, so that it can&#x27;t work with LinkedIn. If you have a LinkedIn account, delete it. Problem solved. If they sue you, do not spend every dime on an attorney trying to fight them. Lose. Then declare bankruptcy immediately and protect your assets. LinkedIn can suck it. Also, don&#x27;t be afraid. It costs them nothing to send a S&amp;D letter. It costs them a fortune to sue you, for which they can only achieve some extremely unprofitable satisfaction. I would even send a copy of a notarized letter to them telling them to stop contacting you. Do it every time they contact you. On their fourth attempt to intimidate you, go to a magistrate and request a restraining order against them.
评论 #34584486 未加载
评论 #34584541 未加载
评论 #34584652 未加载
评论 #34584373 未加载
93po超过 2 年前
Not a lawyer, but I would strongly recommend not responding to that letter until you&#x27;ve spoken to one (and possibly never, even after talking to a lawyer, if that is their guidance)
sergiotapia超过 2 年前
Funny how Microsoft is suing you but they can basically rape the internet at large to build their GPT bot. It is true if you have enough money you can just do whatever you want.
artificial超过 2 年前
Careful using any trademarks without permission. Trademark law has some teeth. Remove anything without explicit consent to use. Business side it looks like an endorsement.
user3939382超过 2 年前
Funny LinkedIn is so proactive given that, of my hundreds of unique-per-org email addresses, the only one that gets spam is my LinkedIn email.
shahbaby超过 2 年前
On a side note, this is why you should try to build web scrapping tools which don&#x27;t deviate too far from normal user behavior.
tehlike超过 2 年前
you, as the provider of the extension, are not violating the rules. in fact, you are not even giving specialized linkedin features.... it&#x27;s one of the general purpose automation stuff.<p>I would be surprised if their letter has any teeth besides scaremongering.<p>get an opinion from legal, i am definitely not a lawyer.
mirekrusin超过 2 年前
LinkedIn User Agreement may apply for people who agree to it, not everybody on the planet Earth.
saurik超过 2 年前
(edit: I see someone says you posted the letter as a pdf link and I missed it. And that you might be using their trademarks. Be very very very careful about trademarks: I often come on here to tell people not to fuck with trademarks if you do stuff like this as that&#x27;s often the only case these companies have and it is so easy to avoid. I am tired though and have a meeting and am not going to read the pdf, especially as that will verge even more into the danger zone of me giving you legal advice. The rest of what I said here stands.)<p>I am not a lawyer. I deal in this area, but I have lawyers--lots of lawyers--and my primary recommendation is that if you work in this space you have a lawyer.<p>I am going to tell you something, though, about this cease and desist. From the perspective of it effectively being &quot;advice&quot;, I encourage you to consider it a &quot;this is the minimum level of damage they can do to you&quot;: I am not saying there aren&#x27;t interesting things that I don&#x27;t know off--that&#x27;s like, why we have lawyers--that would <i>really</i> screw you. I also haven&#x27;t analyzed your extension in any way to know anything about your situation other than what you wrote.<p>&gt; Cease and desist developing, offering, or using software or programs with features developed, marketed, or intended for automating activity on LinkedIn’s website or app, scraping LinkedIn member data, or otherwise violating the LinkedIn User Agreement.<p>The user agreement is an agreement that has limited consideration and limited recourse. Typically, they can take their balls back and send you home (it&#x27;s their court, so they don&#x27;t have to leave), so if they want to they can terminate your account... it isn&#x27;t <i>illegal</i> to violate the terms of even a well-accepted and carefully done contract (which terms of service ain&#x27;t), but the recourses for such a limited consideration is also pretty limited, and they know this enough that it even says it in the agreement: they can terminate your account.<p>If this were me, I barely use LinkedIn. I haven&#x27;t had a normal looking job in forever and I have no interest in getting one ever again. I don&#x27;t care about my profile (despite updating it every decade or so) and I only check for new connections and messages once every year or so. I really only use the service for cyberstalking, and never understood why people care so much about it. If they wanted to terminate <i>my</i> account, well, &quot;big whoop&quot;, right? I&#x27;d tell them to go pound sand. Hell: that user agreement--which they are really trying to make legit--seriously says you can terminate it at any time (in exchange for your account being terminated).<p>But maybe you like LinkedIn and need your account. If that&#x27;s the case, you should cease and desist and maybe even try to apologize while pleading a lack of knowledge of what you were doing or why it was a problem. (But of course, if they then terminate your account, come back with a literal vengeance and refuse to deal with them until they give you back your account.) But like, just realize: you likely aren&#x27;t coming out of this one with a LinkedIn account if you want to keep developing this extension. FWIW, I have definitely done stuff like this for years despite large companies with lawyers wishing they could stop me.<p>That said, you also might get sued. You can always get sued: that&#x27;s how our legal system works. They might not have a case, and maybe you can get it thrown out, but that&#x27;s a leap. You should have a lawyer, and they can advice you on the risks of that. But I can say: if you can&#x27;t afford to sit around in court for a year arguing with them about this, you might be playing in the wrong league, as the court system in the United States requires you to be prepared at any time to pay to be in court and very much assumes anyone doing commercial activity has a lawyer.<p>Again: I am not a lawyer. For all I know, you are also violating the CFAA or a law I have never heard of. I have not seen your extension. You also only gave us one sentence of the letter verbatim and one other reference (to hiQ) summarized (edit: I missed the pdf link, per above). And I have a lawyer I would consult before responding, a lawyer I have not consulted today on your behalf: I am just a guy who is telling you &quot;expect to lose your account&quot; and &quot;the account wouldn&#x27;t have mattered to me and I wouldn&#x27;t be afraid, as someone who has successfully done stuff like this for years and has multiple lawyers&quot; (edit: but also as someone who is super anal about trademarks).
s17n超过 2 年前
You need to get a lawyer.
ok123456超过 2 年前
ignore it.