TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Netlify acquires Gatsby

289 点作者 QuiiBz超过 2 年前

23 条评论

corywatilo超过 2 年前
Netlify lost my trust a year ago when they tried to increase our company&#x27;s pricing more than 10x. (We were paying ~$200&#x2F;mo, then they tried to force us into a $2,500+ plan because we were 1 seat over their self-serve threshold.)<p>From my perspective, they were adding features just to find ways to grow revenue. (I get it, you don&#x27;t have a huge moat by simply hosting static sites.) But their features seemed very out of touch with our needs, and I can&#x27;t imagine we were the only ones.<p>As a Gatsby user on a large-scale website, I&#x27;m disappointed to see this acquisition because I&#x27;ll now constantly be worried they&#x27;ll try to pull a similar stunt with Gatsby.<p>Since then, I&#x27;ve been using Next.js + Vercel on side projects, and now with this acquisition, I don&#x27;t see that changing going forward.<p>Trust and loyalty is everything in the developer community. It&#x27;s hard to gain and easy to break. Hopefully other developer-focused alternatives will keep this first and foremost in their head so we don&#x27;t end up in this situation with other platforms down the road.
评论 #34616921 未加载
评论 #34616488 未加载
评论 #34614594 未加载
评论 #34614569 未加载
评论 #34614565 未加载
joshmanders超过 2 年前
Vercel has Next.js, Shopify just acquired Remix, now Netlify Gatsby.<p>This is bad news for full stack JavaScript applications and ecosystem. This is gonna cause vendor lock-in, it&#x27;s already showing in some of them. Open source is losing and something needs to change.<p>I am seeing a future where you have to rewrite your whole app in a different framework just to change hosts.
评论 #34614912 未加载
评论 #34615143 未加载
评论 #34614281 未加载
评论 #34614592 未加载
评论 #34619906 未加载
评论 #34614360 未加载
评论 #34621548 未加载
评论 #34615197 未加载
评论 #34615020 未加载
评论 #34624364 未加载
评论 #34614347 未加载
评论 #34614384 未加载
评论 #34614395 未加载
评论 #34617492 未加载
bilater超过 2 年前
Likely was an acquihire because Gatsby has been dying for a while now. It was my first (post CRA) React framework so I used to have love for it and its been sad to see its decline.<p>Netfliy is still keeping up for the most part with Vercel though it is definitely behind. My biggest pet peeve with both companies is their pricing model on bandwidth. 1 TB free and then they charge 40-55 bucks for every additional 100GB! That just seems so lop sided to me.<p>And I can tell you from working at companies that use them that this usually compounds fairly quickly for medium to high traffic sites and you end up paying a lot. It&#x27;s still worth it (especially if you compare against the dev time to keep things running smoothly) but wish it was cheaper.
CharlesW超过 2 年前
In case Netlify folks are reading: I feel like this was written by someone who lives and breathes &quot;composable web architectures&quot; to the point that they forgot to mention what they are, why they&#x27;re interesting, and how Netlify&#x27;s support for them is unique.<p>I <i>think</i> it just means that you can use different stuff together, but I&#x27;m having a hard time piecing together how that&#x27;s new, and why Netlify purchased Gatsby to do this.
lukeingalls超过 2 年前
The story of gatsby based on stackoverflow polls isn&#x27;t so good. In 2020 they are (60% loved)[<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;insights.stackoverflow.com&#x2F;survey&#x2F;2020#technology-most-loved-dreaded-and-wanted-web-frameworks" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;insights.stackoverflow.com&#x2F;survey&#x2F;2020#technology-mo...</a>] in 2021 (its 48%)[<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;insights.stackoverflow.com&#x2F;survey&#x2F;2020#technology-most-loved-dreaded-and-wanted-web-frameworks" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;insights.stackoverflow.com&#x2F;survey&#x2F;2020#technology-mo...</a>] and 2022 (is 35%)[<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;insights.stackoverflow.com&#x2F;survey&#x2F;2020#technology-most-loved-dreaded-and-wanted-web-frameworks" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;insights.stackoverflow.com&#x2F;survey&#x2F;2020#technology-mo...</a>]
davidw超过 2 年前
Was scanning the page really quickly and though that Netflix had acquired the Gatsby franchise and we could look forward to &quot;Great Gatsby 2 - The Vendetta&quot;, &quot;The Greatest Gatsby&quot;, &quot;Gatsby Strikes Back&quot; and so on.
lechacker超过 2 年前
Didn&#x27;t Netlify have layoffs recently? Wouldn&#x27;t expect a non-public company that needed to layoff +10% of their workforce to have the kind of cash to buy out another company.
评论 #34613850 未加载
brycewray超过 2 年前
Related post from Gatsby&#x27;s creator, Kyle Mathews:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gatsbyjs.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;gatsby-is-joining-netlify" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gatsbyjs.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;gatsby-is-joining-netlify</a>
merlinoa超过 2 年前
I host an old blog on netlify. I don&#x27;t update it anymore, but a few months ago I started seeing a large uptick in subscribers. They were all subscribing through the netlify subscription form. It was around 8 to 10 new subscribers a day where before it was one every couple months. I emailed several of the new subscribers and got no response. After a few days I strongly suspected these were not real subscribers.<p>But why would someone waste their time adding a few subscribers to my old, non updated blog everyday? A couple weeks later I got an email from Netlify saying that I was being upgraded to a payment plan because of the amount of activity on my Netlify hosted form.
评论 #34624470 未加载
IceWreck超过 2 年前
Their competitor Vercel has NextJS so they decided to buy Gatsby ?
评论 #34613527 未加载
评论 #34613413 未加载
teg4n_超过 2 年前
Hopefully they got a good deal! Personally I don’t understand the value proposition.<p>I would have preferred more support for 11ty or SolidStart since they employ the creators of those two frameworks already.
评论 #34613776 未加载
awill超过 2 年前
This kind of stuff is annoying. Netlify had no need to acquire this. They just want to increase their revenue. As a Hugo user on Netlify, I hope this doesn&#x27;t affect me negatively.
评论 #34614013 未加载
评论 #34614110 未加载
评论 #34617516 未加载
luispa超过 2 年前
Netlify just acquire 2018.
asadlionpk超过 2 年前
Gatsby is dead weight. Likely an acquihire.
评论 #34614529 未加载
discodave超过 2 年前
Maybe the way to think about this isn&#x27;t so much from the perspective of Netflifys leadership, but Gatsby and their founders&#x2F;investors.<p>Had Gatsby found a scalable business model?<p>Maybe this is more of a saving-face&#x2F;acquihire for Gatsby. Granted, there is potentially some strategic benefit for Netlify, but not enough to justify a large acquisition price (the price is not mentioned in the press-release).
moafzalmulla超过 2 年前
I just want to know how much Gatsby was acquired for ? ;)
评论 #34614018 未加载
评论 #34614434 未加载
评论 #34613715 未加载
fatih-erikli超过 2 年前
Gatsby was an open-source project. What they acquired exactly? Have they purchased a usb stick installed gatsby in it?
评论 #34614002 未加载
评论 #34613821 未加载
评论 #34613853 未加载
评论 #34613798 未加载
评论 #34613799 未加载
评论 #34614081 未加载
评论 #34613973 未加载
johntiger1超过 2 年前
Interesting, I remember writing my first static site a while back using gatsby. Wonder if this changes anything
bovermyer超过 2 年前
Why Gatsby, specifically?<p>This seems like an odd choice.
评论 #34613442 未加载
评论 #34613610 未加载
评论 #34613898 未加载
ferdowsi超过 2 年前
The statement doesn&#x27;t say how much Gatsby was acquired for. Hope that Gatsby equity holders weren&#x27;t bought out at a steep discount, given the current macro situation.
评论 #34614219 未加载
Raed667超过 2 年前
&gt; we are thrilled to join forces<p>How many people were let go as a result of this acquisition? (I know for a fact that the number is not zero)
schnebbau超过 2 年前
People still use Gatsby?
评论 #34613580 未加载
评论 #34616762 未加载
评论 #34613584 未加载
评论 #34613578 未加载
moafzalmulla超过 2 年前
I just want to know how much for :)