TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Blender moves from Phabricator to Gitea

124 点作者 stephdin超过 2 年前

11 条评论

qwertox超过 2 年前
One note on Phabricator: "Effective June 1, 2021: Phabricator is no longer actively maintained"
评论 #34700838 未加载
评论 #34700908 未加载
lucideer超过 2 年前
This is an interesting move in the context of the recent kerfuffle around Gitea - context: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33749757" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33749757</a><p>I wonder whether this was part of discussion on the migrating within the Blender team or whether their migration just started before the Gitea org-change.<p>---<p>Off-topic but it&#x27;s also funny that the Phabricator fork is Phorge &amp; the Gitea fork is Forgejo...
评论 #34701946 未加载
评论 #34705986 未加载
thcipriani超过 2 年前
Makes me wonder what all the other users of phab are doing. I know: twitter, dropbox, freebsd, and mozilla were all using it in some point.<p>I think haskell moved to GitLab, now Blender&#x27;s on Gitea.<p>I&#x27;m curious if people are moving to phorge?<p>Wikimedia still uses phab for bug tracking. Taking a look at phorge Soon™
sublinear超过 2 年前
Not to dunk on Phabricator, but did anyone actually enjoy using it? I always thought it was a mess anyway. Jenkins was also... &quot;jankins&quot;. Of course this is all hindsight, but wow it doesn&#x27;t even seem that long ago.
评论 #34703250 未加载
评论 #34703618 未加载
评论 #34701449 未加载
评论 #34702368 未加载
评论 #34702087 未加载
评论 #34702917 未加载
Scaevolus超过 2 年前
Is Gitea code review any good? If they cloned Github it&#x27;s going to be an inferior experience compared to Phabricator.
rurban超过 2 年前
And this blog post describes their adventure: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;code.blender.org&#x2F;2022&#x2F;07&#x2F;gitea-diaries-part-1&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;code.blender.org&#x2F;2022&#x2F;07&#x2F;gitea-diaries-part-1&#x2F;</a><p>Which includes the famous start of the gitea shitstorm: &quot;And, quite significantly, we’re in the finishing stages of having a support agreement with the Gitea project to have them support us in our migration by funding work on missing features, code and bugfixes that will be available 100% to Gitea users under Gitea’s MIT license.&quot;
cowmix超过 2 年前
I wonder how Gitea will hold up to all the traffic? Even Gitea hosts their stuff on Github.
评论 #34701336 未加载
评论 #34700768 未加载
评论 #34700772 未加载
评论 #34700618 未加载
评论 #34700902 未加载
shapefrog超过 2 年前
Gitea really really really looks like github.
评论 #34701376 未加载
account42超过 2 年前
&gt; The Git repositories have changed location.<p>&gt; The development branch is now named main instead of master.<p>If only we could avoid such pointless downstream-affecting changes. Cool URI&#x27;s shouldn&#x27;t change. We have the technology. And doing such changes to satisfy manufactured outrage is even more sad.
notepalf超过 2 年前
Did they consider moving to gitlab?
评论 #34702994 未加载
rvz超过 2 年前
Great news for self hosting and not sitting on and going all in on unreliable services like GitHub.
评论 #34700799 未加载