TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Wikipedia's “moderate yet systematic” liberal citation bias

42 点作者 akolbe超过 2 年前

8 条评论

Manuel_D超过 2 年前
Wikipedia&#x27;s bias is more prevalent on specific pages, or collections of topics. Many pages have zero or near zero bias. You&#x27;re not going to have much bias on scientific topics like, say resonant structures.<p>It&#x27;s a lot more prone to bias on biographical topics, where senior editors can essentially suppress any negative coverage, or promote embellished facts about a person. Take a gander at the talk page of controversial articles, or more specifically the history of the talk page since talk pages themselves get pruned and censored.
评论 #34746750 未加载
egberts1超过 2 年前
For a very long time since 2004, is a real struggle to get “Deaf” to be recognized as a culture on Wikipedia.<p>But these Wikipedia authors seems hell-bent on medical approach and total ignorance, not to mention that Wikipedia wants their preferred but offensive “hearing-impaired” over our preferred “hard-of-hearing”.<p>So, a bunch of us Deaf Wikipedians still got overridden by these “Liberal” moderators wearing pink&#x2F;purple hair, multi-piercing and what nots.<p>Even deleted my drafts under my User: folder without my permission on various Deaf things. (only Deaf History made the cut).<p>I’ve. since stayed clear of Wikipedia and their progressive armies.
评论 #34749312 未加载
drak0n1c超过 2 年前
The co-founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, has written on this topic repeatedly.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;larrysanger.org&#x2F;2020&#x2F;05&#x2F;wikipedia-is-badly-biased&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;larrysanger.org&#x2F;2020&#x2F;05&#x2F;wikipedia-is-badly-biased&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;larrysanger.org&#x2F;2022&#x2F;03&#x2F;why-neutrality&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;larrysanger.org&#x2F;2022&#x2F;03&#x2F;why-neutrality&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=l0P4Cf0UCwU">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=l0P4Cf0UCwU</a>
评论 #34746984 未加载
Domobran7超过 2 年前
I am not certain it is just &quot;moderate&quot;, but it definitely exists.
human超过 2 年前
If you think you hold the truth, you don’t. If you think your position is unbiased, you’re wrong. We are all flawed and ignorant humans and recognizing it is the first step to enlightenment.
mansion7超过 2 年前
WikiMedia is known to have paid &quot;edit-thons&quot; to edit their site.<p>These are grants given to organizations, primarily of a certain political bent, with the express purpose of creating and editing content. And when such grants are given out on this manner, it&#x27;s hardly a surprise when the desired outcome is achieved.
askin4it超过 2 年前
Always a lot of drama at the Project Veritas article if you want to see their techniques in action.
ThrowawayTestr超过 2 年前
This is obvious if you&#x27;ve read an article on any even sightly controversial topic.<p>Know Your Meme is less partisan.