TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Why do email addresses need a user name?

9 点作者 escot超过 2 年前
I was thinking it would be cool to be able to have an email address that is just a domain, for example if I own bobsmith.com why can't I have bobsmith.com as my email address? Why does SMTP require a username, eg bob@bobsmith.com?

4 条评论

taubek超过 2 年前
RFC 5321 defines the what that address looks like. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rfc-editor.org&#x2F;rfc&#x2F;rfc5321#page-15" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rfc-editor.org&#x2F;rfc&#x2F;rfc5321#page-15</a>
LinuxBender超过 2 年前
Existing RFC&#x27;s require an email address. What you are looking for would require a new RFC to have a default address for a domain and of course changes to all MUA&#x27;s&#x2F;MTA&#x27;s.<p>I think the shortest path to make something like this would just be to have an amending RFC that includes a lookup of a specific TXT record if an email address is not present. That TXT record could have a <i>default</i> email address for the domain.
评论 #34830049 未加载
评论 #34798453 未加载
rsclient超过 2 年前
Historically, when the email protocol was first made [RFC 561](<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rfc-editor.org&#x2F;rfc&#x2F;rfc561" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rfc-editor.org&#x2F;rfc&#x2F;rfc561</a>) in 1973 personal computers were rare and very low power. At the time, hardly anyone owned a computer on their own.<p>That said, might be cool, but good luck getting most apps to accept something without an @ as an email address
legrande超过 2 年前
You could always setup a catch-all for `bobsmith.com` and then you can read every e-mail sent to that address, regardless of what username is used.
评论 #34795855 未加载