U.S. on Track to Add $19T in New Debt over 10 Years

Makes the space station or going to the moon in the 1960’s look cheap.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.yahoo.com&#x2F;video&#x2F;cost-travel-moon-mars-beyond-200009814.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.yahoo.com&#x2F;video&#x2F;cost-travel-moon-mars-beyond-200...</a><p>With that kind of money, we could have cured a few cancers, cured Alzheimer’s, solved fusion, and still had several trillion left over…<p>The James Webb Telescope cost only a fraction of the interest on that debt<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;usafacts.org&#x2F;articles&#x2F;how-much-did-nasas-james-webb-space-telescope-cost&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;usafacts.org&#x2F;articles&#x2F;how-much-did-nasas-james-webb-...</a>

I&#x27;m just curious where people think the money should come from?<p>It&#x27;s not like poor and lower income people save a lot of money so if we cut programs or raise taxes on them it will come straight out of the GDP making the cuts pointless.<p>I would also think anything that &quot;forced&quot; them to &quot;get a job&quot; would push them into low paying service jobs which would increase labor supply without increasing demand much only lowering prices again causing GDP to go down.<p>not sure if I&#x27;m thinking about this correctly?

Doesn&#x27;t really matter does it? No-one is ever going to call it in. Lest the whole house of cards collapse.