TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Would you consider pay half now and then for each year a device lasts?

1 点作者 mar1n3r0超过 2 年前
Over the past 5 years we can notice aggressive planned obsolescence applied across pretty much all products. From an all-sealed non-repairable designs to software limitations it&#x27;s visible even to the non-technical users.<p>We can differentiate two product cycles. Premium products with no planned obsolescence - higher price, less frequent change of device. Mainstream products - designed to be replaced frequently, lower price.<p>Ideas<p>Initial price as low as mainstream. Users pay a fixed additional fee for each functioning year of the product thus reaching premium price if the product lasts longer.<p>A marketplace where only products with no planned obsolescence are sold based on the above model<p>Would you switch to such a purchasing model as a user?<p>Would you switch to such a production model as a company?

2 条评论

gregjor超过 2 年前
No. Too hard to forecast cash flow on the business side. And how would you handle someone paying half then telling you the device broke?
评论 #34938610 未加载
allears超过 2 年前
Nope. Sometimes a device just gets outmoded, or my needs change, or I might just get bored with it. I wouldn&#x27;t want to have to keep paying for it regardless.