TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Why hasn't YouTube removed those fake MrBeast $1000 giveaway ad scams?

32 点作者 laech大约 2 年前
Example scam in the YouTube app: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ibb.co&#x2F;BNVy1ZR<p>I have been seeing this scam ad in the YouTube mobile app for the last few months, that claims anyone who sees this ad will get $1000 dollars. It seems crazy to me that Google&#x2F;YouTube hasn&#x27;t done anything about it so far, or have they?

8 条评论

joshka大约 2 年前
When asking &quot;why?&quot; for something like this, follow the money. This one is pretty simple:<p>1. The ad is paid for already by someone.<p>2. To remove an ad, there needs to be a system to report it (or an automation).<p>3. To check that system, requires human effort.<p>4. The human effort to review ads likely costs more than the ad paid to be displayed.<p>5. The effort to minimize that cost costs more than the revenue lost by displaying bad ads.<p>6. etc.<p>Personally I value my time more than the $12&#x2F;mo it costs to not see ads on YouTube.
评论 #34943150 未加载
评论 #34943175 未加载
eiiot大约 2 年前
YouTube doesn&#x27;t have a huge incentive to remove these ads immediately (after all, if they&#x27;re working, YouTube is making money).<p>YouTube just generally isn&#x27;t known for being the best about spam stuff (comments, ads, etc.), so this fits within that narrative.
评论 #34943114 未加载
Retr0id大约 2 年前
I followed the trail on one of these before. It was backed by a real company, and as best I can tell, you really <i>can</i> get the $1000 if you jump through enough hoops. These hoops involve signing up for auto-renew free-trial subscription services (requiring payment info), surveys, etc.<p>Definitely not something I&#x27;d want to bother participating in, but it seems like it&#x27;s not a <i>complete</i> scam. It has scammy vibes, but seemingly not out-right illegal, such that the company is allowed to continue to exist.<p>The supposed Mr beast endorsement is the potential sticking point, I suppose he isn&#x27;t in on it, but <i>he&#x27;d</i> have to be the one to complain to YouTube about impersonation - I doubt you&#x27;d get very far trying to report it as a 3rd party without concrete evidence of impersonation.<p>The one I looked into was called &quot;National Consumer Center&quot;[1], backed by RewardsFlow LLC[2]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;old.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;beermoney&#x2F;comments&#x2F;i1ndrg&#x2F;anyone_ever_had_success_with_national_consumer&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;old.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;beermoney&#x2F;comments&#x2F;i1ndrg&#x2F;anyone_ev...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nycompanyregistry.com&#x2F;companies&#x2F;rewardsflow-llc&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nycompanyregistry.com&#x2F;companies&#x2F;rewardsflow-llc&#x2F;</a>
tjpnz大约 2 年前
Google are making too much money from it. Only way it&#x27;s going to stop is through regulation or a series of successful class action suits.
SteveNuts大约 2 年前
YouTube ads have become mostly spam for me too lately.<p>Some of them are making very dangerous medical claims, I&#x27;m also shocked google has done nothing but also not surprised at all.
评论 #34943180 未加载
josephcsible大约 2 年前
The scammers are paying Google money for the ads. Hiring enough people to deal with scams would cost Google money. So the reason is that there&#x27;s perverse financial incentives on both ends.
grrdotcloud大约 2 年前
A recent visit to YouTube, the top left video was to a link away from YouTube.<p>I believe this means someone significant.
tech234a大约 2 年前
I have also seen a lot of fake Tesla&#x2F;OpenAI&#x2F;Elon Musk livestreams in the recommendations recently. They aren&#x27;t ads, but instead seem to be run on hacked channels that have a few thousand subscribers.