TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The evidence behind 4 day work weeks

2 点作者 svsaraf大约 2 年前

1 comment

rogerkirkness大约 2 年前
If you read the primary sources behind these headlines, studies find that knowledge workers who work 55 hours per week have the greatest creatively useful output of any amount of hours. Above 55 hours a week the output gets flat, reflecting no additional creative work utility. Up until 30 hours, the line is steep, hence where all the '6 hours per day' and '4 days per week' stuff comes from. But from 30 to 55 hours, you're still getting more done, it is just less per hour than the base 30 hours. One type of person looks at that and says 'I am less efficient over 30 hours, so why bother?'. Another type looks at that and says 'I get the most done by working 55 hours a week'. Both are true. Finally, these things are highly individual. People on the spectrum are able to focus on their special interest as much as 15-16 hours a day, which is not true of neurotypicals. So it is as an individual most important to know yourself, and in aggregate to know the median when setting policy.