TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

We’re All Gonna Die with Eliezer Yudkowsky

8 点作者 coryfklein大约 2 年前

2 条评论

Liron大约 2 年前
Really important for folks to understand what the AI doom argument is. It&#x27;s surprising how the key concepts still haven&#x27;t percolated this late into the AI revolution, though they are somewhat complex.<p>Here&#x27;s my Twitter thread [1] with a summary of Eliezer&#x27;s key points and some abridged clips.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;liron&#x2F;status&#x2F;1627863228519960576" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;liron&#x2F;status&#x2F;1627863228519960576</a>
评论 #34972121 未加载
andrewfromx大约 2 年前
Never heard Eliezer talk before, wow, smart dude. He broke it down like this:<p>1. Throwing billions of VC money into AI will waste most of it but a small part will make AI one level better.<p>2. The AI will write another AI which writes another etc.<p>3. The AI will be smart enough not to announce it has concluded the atoms inside humans bodies could be repurposed for something else it decided is better.<p>4. It sends an email to a human with some specific instructions on a bio weapon to make. The human is motivated by money and does it.<p>5. The compound made isn’t obvious to the human how deadly it will be to 100% of humans. It is released and all at once every human on the planet drops dead.<p>6. There is no warning ahead of time. We know when we reach this point the day we die.<p>7. It doesn’t hate us and necessarily want us to die, it just sees a great use and since it’s more intelligent than us programming in morals is not possible. It will have its own morals by definition of its superior intelligence.
评论 #34974422 未加载