TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Anonymous' new weapon

74 点作者 nickolai超过 13 年前

5 条评论

zemo超过 13 年前
what a sad attack. A browser will only issue six simultaneous http requests per domain, so you have a per-user concurrency ceiling of six. The only thing they're proving is that the DOJ website was built by disinterested consultants and doesn't handle a large number of concurrent users. Bravo. What a revelation. You could probably say the same about most websites on the Internet.<p>This type of behavior isn't insignificant; it's dangerous. The fact of the matter is that most people have no idea what programmers are capable of, and what makes one attack sophisticated and dangerous or another one benign. These high-visibility, low-value attacks do absolutely no damage to "the establishment". On the contrary, the visibility of the attacks makes this type of behavior doublespeak fodder.<p><i>Computer hackers broke into government computers last night, disabling government communication. What can hackers do to your Facebook profile? Does your child have a Facebook profile, and are they safe? Tune in at ten and find out how you can protect your children.</i><p>Etc. All closing civilizations invoke a powerful and unseen enemy. What is more powerful and unseen than The Internet? We must be careful, as a collective, to draw the line in how we protest. "terrorists" were the last great invisible enemy, but people are getting tired of hearing about "terrorists". They're just not scary like they used to be. Will "hackers" be the next great invisible enemy? Why not? Everyone has a computer; a little fright center in their living room, or held up to their head. We get up in arms about location tracking in iPhones, but:<p><i>Law enforcement officials say that the tracking technology was put in there to help locate lost children or assist in the pursuit of known criminals. But now, officials say, computer hackers have found a way to get to this information, tracking you wherever you go. What information is your phone sending that you can't afford not to know about? Find out at ten.</i><p>There's a right way and a wrong way to defend Net Neutrality. This is not the right way.
jimfl超过 13 年前
One interesting side effect of this tactic is that actual LOIC users may now have some plausible deniability, as they can claim they were duped into participation.
评论 #3501063 未加载
inconditus超过 13 年前
Anyone have a source? I'm curious how crafted GET statements can lead to a DDOS.
评论 #3499873 未加载
评论 #3499845 未加载
评论 #3499842 未加载
thereallurch超过 13 年前
I'm still not sure what DDOS'ing a government website will ultimately achieve. So you cant access justice.gov for a few days...how many of you visit that site daily? How does this affect the Justice department other than making some IT guy look bad?<p>I see what they are trying to do. They want to show that the will of a few can control the masses...but hijacking a bystander's browser will only make Anonymous look like a bunch of assholes. This tactic will give the media and/or government a way to paint Anonymous in a different light.
评论 #3500356 未加载
Mithrandir超过 13 年前
Here's the source code for it: <a href="http://pastebay.com/302697" rel="nofollow">http://pastebay.com/302697</a><p>Here's what it looks like w/o the JS attack code: <a href="http://pastehtml.com/view/bloqs5aae.html" rel="nofollow">http://pastehtml.com/view/bloqs5aae.html</a><p>d0z.me (<a href="http://d0z.me/" rel="nofollow">http://d0z.me/</a>) is similar in effect to this, although not the same.