TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A case against Layer 4 security tools

23 点作者 CKMo大约 2 年前

4 条评论

burnte大约 2 年前
Uh, no. Maybe their tools have value, but their arguments are simply wrong. Nothing they say about L4 is true as far as cons. They link to another article about VPNs being &quot;bad&quot; where they said VPNs:<p>Disrupt productivity Increase workload and margin of error No monitoring capability Poor security, utilizing a flawed and incomplete security model<p>None of which are true. I have hundreds of healthcare employees all over the country and they&#x27;re highly productive, we have LOTS of monitoring abilities, highly secure and does not have an &quot;incomplete&quot; security model for whatever that means. The workload increase thing is silly, clicking a single button is not an increased workload.
评论 #35013580 未加载
评论 #35020054 未加载
JohnMakin大约 2 年前
&quot;Less reliable: Layer 7 does not provide the same level of reliability as Layer 4, as it does not have the same error-checking mechanisms.&quot;<p>Uh, doesn&#x27;t stuff like HTTP run on top of layer 4? (eg, tcp). This article doesn&#x27;t seem entirely correct, but I&#x27;m a dunce with this stuff.
评论 #35017164 未加载
adrr大约 2 年前
If its layer 7, then you have to push a cert to the endpoints and MITM the traffic since everything is running SSL&#x2F;TLS. Not sure that is exactly safer since now your security monitoring tools have access to everyone&#x27;s password and authentication credentials.
rileymat2大约 2 年前
In the picture, can someone explain FTP and MPG and JPEG at layer 6? I don&#x27;t understand this.<p>Edit: I am not exactly sure of the distinction between HTTP and FTP in the layers.
评论 #35017123 未加载