TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Globally Distributed Elixir over Tailscale

121 点作者 moomerman大约 2 年前

3 条评论

1MachineElf大约 2 年前
Very cool concept.<p>Reminds me of the intended use case of Nebula, which seems very similar to this. If you&#x27;re interested in a bare-bones and totally self-hosted option, it could be a good choice here. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;slackhq&#x2F;nebula">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;slackhq&#x2F;nebula</a>
评论 #35062490 未加载
评论 #35065558 未加载
l72大约 2 年前
I would be very curious to see how well this actually works in different data centers. My understanding of empd is that it basically expects all nodes will be on the same switch. I don&#x27;t believe there is any default handling for spikes in latency or netsplits, and epmd is known to be pretty chatty.<p>The common wisdom seems to be to do federation of clusters rather than clustering multiple data centers together.
评论 #35071097 未加载
评论 #35066903 未加载
sph大约 2 年前
How is Tailscale to connect production servers? I will need to do something like that very soon, to have many geo-distributed workers for my Elixir app, and I was thinking of using raw Wireguard, ansible scripts, and some effort required.<p>I use it at home, and I&#x27;m not sure I <i>need</i> yet another third-party product to do some average networking setup, but I have to admit it&#x27;s pretty decent at what it does.<p>So... is anyone using Tailscale on their servers?
评论 #35069272 未加载
评论 #35069467 未加载