TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why π^π^π^π could be an integer (for all we know) [video] (2021)

7 点作者 JohnHammersley大约 2 年前

3 条评论

version_five大约 2 年前
The video was insanely obnoxious, I could only watch about 5 seconds and I recommend nobody click.<p>It&#x27;s an interesting question though, I found an adult discussion about it: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;Why-is-it-unknown-whether-4-pi-pi-pi-pi-pi-is-an-integer" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;Why-is-it-unknown-whether-4-pi-pi-pi-p...</a>
DerekL大约 2 年前
Title needs (2021).
Konohamaru大约 2 年前
Tbh, the fact that mathematical logic cannot prove that e + π or π^π^π^π are irrational numbers is a huge failure of formal mathematical logic.<p>David Hume said that the purpose of logic is to record patterns of thinking we use, and every mathematician has a subconscious pattern of thinking that let&#x27;s them look at the expressions e + π and π^π^π^π and conclude &quot;there&#x27;s no way these could be rational&quot;. So the fact that we failed to write down these patterns of thought means our system of formal logic is extremely incomplete.
评论 #35084651 未加载
评论 #35077624 未加载
评论 #35080475 未加载