TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The FDIC should bailout the SVB

9 点作者 snow_mac大约 2 年前

9 条评论

tomato_123大约 2 年前
Apocalyptic nonsense aside (good ideas, good people, and good innovations will continue even if the current equity holders of a startup are wiped out), if the argument is "we need to make sure people can make their mortgage payments," then let's have the federal government send the affected workers checks for their mortgage payments. None of this indirect bailouts for careless VCs nonsense.
评论 #35115113 未加载
tomato_123大约 2 年前
&gt; If you banked at SVB, you should not be punished, you in good faith put $300,000 of your companies revenues into your account (IT SHOULD BE SAFE) and that will let you pay your employees and bills for the next few months, the bank fails, you should not fail.<p>$250,000 is safe. Ya&#x27;ll are apparently intelligent people. You can read the most basic fine print.
评论 #35116152 未加载
评论 #35116453 未加载
idopmstuff大约 2 年前
It seems to me like SVB should be a fairly attractive acquisition target for a major bank. You get an immediate foothold in an enormous industry, and if you&#x27;ve got enough scale, the concentration among tech doesn&#x27;t hurt you.<p>Seems like a Chase or even a major investment bank that wants relationships with those companies that may eventually IPO could take a short term financial hit and still easily come out on top in the medium-long term.
Zetice大约 2 年前
&gt; I agree, let the bank fail and the bankers should go to jail.<p>Curious about why the bankers are getting such ire. Is there a good article describing where negligence kicked in to cause this? Because from what I can tell in my very limited understanding of this situation, they bought <i>very</i> safe bonds that just so happened to be exactly the wrong thing given what happened in the ensuing years.
评论 #35115181 未加载
bediger4000大约 2 年前
Not sure I&#x27;m getting it. The big return on investment that VCs get is justified by the big risk, isn&#x27;t it? So why shouldn&#x27;t we as a society say, &quot;you risked big, and this time you lost big&quot;?
评论 #35115412 未加载
chitowneats大约 2 年前
Silicon Valley lobbying to be Too Big To Fail. I predict they will get their way. What a complete joke. They&#x27;ll be laughing all the way to the (solvent) bank.
评论 #35117320 未加载
Overtonwindow大约 2 年前
Fortunately, the FDIC lacks the statutory authority to bail out SVB. Without congressional action it would really be an extraordinary move by the treasury.
fbdab103大约 2 年前
Capitalism only works if companies can die. We (the public) cannot continue to let financial institutions pursue ever riskier investments, banking on the idea that the government will bail out the reckless.
评论 #35115057 未加载
cirrus3大约 2 年前
*too