TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Show HN: Scriptable.run, make your product extendable by anyone.

38 点作者 cheerioty大约 2 年前

14 条评论

CJefferson大约 2 年前
A brief review.<p>I have no idea what your product does.<p>The example at the top of the docs pages still doesn&#x27;t help me understand what your product does. It also doesn&#x27;t work, it just returns: {&quot;message&quot;:&quot;access token is not valid for this request&quot;}<p>I&#x27;m guessing that&#x27;s because I need to get a valid access token to run the example? Well then you&#x27;d better say that, and tell me how to do it, or even better don&#x27;t require it for your first example to work.<p>I tried going into the &quot;Advanced Guide&quot;. It had a handy first link that linked me to &quot;Hello world in scriptable&quot;. That sent me back to the first page of the docs, with the example that doesn&#x27;t work. At this point, I&#x27;m stuck and out, sorry.
评论 #35178571 未加载
faizshah大约 2 年前
It sounds like this is providing a sandboxed wasm runtime as a service is that right?<p>I think in this case the landing page is lacking in technical details to the point where it’s hard to understand what the product actually is. I like the general idea of firecracker as a service and sandboxed code as a service though.<p>Even the webhook example doesn’t really show where scriptable fits in, I think what you’re trying to say is that the customer can write some code to integrate the product with their slack and then the service will call the customer’s code in a sandboxed environment which is how the customer can extend the product right?
评论 #35178714 未加载
评论 #35179945 未加载
itsaquicknote大约 2 年前
Your corporate memphis girl splash-art is holding a puzzle piece that can clearly never fit. The subtle negative implications of that really sat with me.
评论 #35180213 未加载
rtpg大约 2 年前
I have had a similar-ish idea floating in my head for a while, which is a library + executor + editor UI for per-app scripting capabilities.<p>Something that would let people write out basic automation workflows to respond to events, similar to what Zapier or Salesforce offers to its users.<p>There are, of course, halting problem-style issues. I _think_ you could paper over some of that at the description level. But really you want the right kind of hooks into the actual system. A scripting tool that is just &quot;oh but you just hit the API&quot; is way less nice than bespoke components for your own system.<p>And with event systems you have the usual event propogation issues of accidentally causing a massive fan-out of events from some action and causing your sysetm to fall over.<p>But this is really something that someone could write out as a component for other systems and make a lot of business SaaS&#x27;s automation floors way better.<p>You really do want to offer _something_ to users, though. The users that can write Javascript... well, Zapier lets you write Javascript. Hell, Google Cloud Platform lets you write Javascript in little script blobs, complete with Google Docs-level concurrency. This is a bit weak compared to that.
评论 #35180649 未加载
评论 #35179089 未加载
memalign大约 2 年前
My favorite Scriptable is from a different developer: an iOS app that lets you automate things by writing JavaScript.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;apps.apple.com&#x2F;us&#x2F;app&#x2F;scriptable&#x2F;id1405459188" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;apps.apple.com&#x2F;us&#x2F;app&#x2F;scriptable&#x2F;id1405459188</a><p>I use this to schedule notifications, create widgets (e.g. to show AQI from PurpleAir), and do quick text processing automation.
评论 #35179107 未加载
nubela大约 2 年前
I don&#x27;t get it. What is this supposed to do? How will it help my product? Or am I not the target audience?
评论 #35178575 未加载
melx大约 2 年前
The pricing modes are confusing - I&#x27;ve seen it at other websites too, is this some kind of trend?!<p>The issue: when I choose &quot;yearly&quot; subscription, the page still shows price <i>per month</i>. So you&#x27;re about to charge me every month? Despite I chosen to pay yearly. And where&#x27;s the &quot;2 months free&quot; if I end up paying monthly??<p>Your starter pack costs:<p>$79&#x2F;m (in &quot;yearly&quot; subscription) - so $79*12 = $948<p>(or $79*10 ??? because of the &quot;2 months free&quot;)<p>$99&#x2F;m - so $99*12 = $1188<p>$1188 - $948 = $240 - so it&#x27;s actually more than &quot;2 months free&quot;.<p>It&#x27;s super confusing and I leave immediately no matter how badly I just wanted to buy it.
评论 #35180877 未加载
hubraumhugo大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ve been using Scriptable to develop a Discord Bot integration for our Questmate task and I think it&#x27;s a very powerful and flexible solution for creating custom integrations.
评论 #35178901 未加载
CSDude大约 2 年前
Hey fellow ex-Atlassian! This is a nice product. I assume it has derived from the use case at Atlassian, with Forge?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.atlassian.com&#x2F;platform&#x2F;forge&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.atlassian.com&#x2F;platform&#x2F;forge&#x2F;</a>
评论 #35178863 未加载
评论 #35179546 未加载
schappim大约 2 年前
Ha! We just implemented this for our own product. We ended up using Lambdas to be able to achieve this, w&#x2F; async rendering of custom Liquid templates for each account.
评论 #35180125 未加载
bluelightning2k大约 2 年前
I saw your testimonial from a company called Questmate, then later saw a copyright notice for the site with that same company.<p>Raised eyebrows is an understatement
评论 #35179340 未加载
pictur大约 2 年前
looks like a producthunt product. i don&#x27;t understand what problem the product is trying to solve.
评论 #35179889 未加载
js4ever大约 2 年前
I understand the idea, but I don&#x27;t understand why your product is easier to use than aws lambda
评论 #35178764 未加载
DeathArrow大约 2 年前
What is this trying to solve? If a customer wants to run custom code, why can&#x27;t I allow him to input an endpoint in his Web API or a webhook?
评论 #35180093 未加载