TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Modern language models refute Chomsky’s approach to language

4 点作者 georgehill大约 2 年前

2 条评论

veqq大约 2 年前
Chomsky&#x27;s approach to language killed traditional philology and real engagement with other languages in linguistics. If all languages can be reduced to a universal grammar, you can just look at English and learn about all languages! This leads to me encountering a horrifying number of &quot;linguists&quot; without competency outside of English.<p>All this, when we have multiple documented natural languages which violate key parts of Chomsky&#x27;s work.<p>This is even worse when looking at language instruction, where older materials are significantly more effective. Polyglots will recommend &quot;Teach Yourself&quot; or &quot;Colloquial&quot; books from the 40-50s, the same with Linguaphone, Assimil etc. for the most part. (50 hours with Assimil and you&#x27;re scratching B2!) Modern materials built on modern pedagogical methods bring the user nowhere after significantly more time invested.
twangist大约 2 年前
They no more &quot;refute&quot; other models of language than numerical methods invalidate or refute symbolic math and exact, closed-form solutions.