TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

AI is most important tech advance in decades

37 点作者 JohnHammersley大约 2 年前

12 条评论

rektide大约 2 年前
I don&#x27;t disagree but it&#x27;s such a shit advancement. It eschews making technology &amp; understanding closer. It amplifies our capabilities yes, but in 99.99999% of cases in deep violation of Engelbartian principles: it&#x27;s not intellectual augmentation, it doesn&#x27;t extend how we think, it thinks for us. It&#x27;s revilesome &amp; further unhinges &amp; decouples us from the real world.<p>It&#x27;s an alien, a remote expert system, that 0.1% of the 0.1% of AI practioners have even the faintest real-ish understanding of. It is a fantastic expert, of deep experience, but it is an idiot savant, and no peer in lifting us up as well.<p>I have never been sadder to see a technology. I lived through the seemingly incredibly short term of Personal Computing which seemingly is at it&#x27;s final ends, first eroded by online-services &amp; Service-as-a-Software-Substitute (SaaSS), and now fatalitied in a Mortal Kombat style by idiot machines fed on the immolent corpus of the internet of posts. A system which seems all too destined to radically outstrip the pop-culture-will-eat-itself idea with a new ultra-hyper-self-consuming internetworked online-content-will-be-begat-by-AIs-begat-by-online-content Oroborous.<p>None of this shit informs. None of it makes clear. None of it raises human consciousness. It&#x27;s the best monkey on a type-writer the universe-we-know has ever seen, but it&#x27;s utterly without soul or character or purpose, is a refined regurgatory mimic devoid of purpose. This is the worst thing to happen to technology.<p>And humanity will spend the rest of my life obsessing over it &amp; fascinated with it. It&#x27;s all bad magic. It&#x27;s all against-the-cause. This is the worst shadow-puppet machine humankind has ever invented, and it&#x27;s visage chains us to the wall. Do Not Want.
评论 #35256973 未加载
评论 #35260549 未加载
评论 #35260385 未加载
评论 #35256290 未加载
评论 #35256790 未加载
评论 #35256249 未加载
jsemrau大约 2 年前
Well, the way I see it, we have spent the last 20 years building Social Media, Influencer culture, Creators, and a Ad-tech driven surveillance.<p>If AI helps us focus on Robotics, Spaceships, and underwater cities, I am game.
评论 #35255503 未加载
评论 #35255434 未加载
评论 #35255344 未加载
评论 #35256688 未加载
评论 #35255703 未加载
atleastoptimal大约 2 年前
It&#x27;s crazy how public fervor over tech advances can sometime correlate with how cool and useful they are (like with AI) or go wildly off the mark and fetishize something entirely scammy and useless (like NFTs).<p>Remember 3-4 years ago when we were all going to live in a magical symphonious world brought to eternal harmony with blockchain built into everything? Now with AI actually promising a world like that (if things go right) people don&#x27;t seem as excited as when the killer app for the new tech was pictures of apes with hash codes pointing to their urls.
评论 #35255863 未加载
评论 #35255738 未加载
mtlmtlmtlmtl大约 2 年前
This is just a thinly veiled advertising piece for Microsoft. Yawn.
wolverine876大约 2 年前
The quality of GPT output is deceptive. It&#x27;s the ultimate confirmation bias:<p>It doesn&#x27;t challenge our norms, it is designed (maybe unintentionally) to repeat them. It repeats them in a friendly, safe, unchallenging voice; and with precision and completeness that signals to us real knowledge.<p>How well do we evaluate its response when it keeps telling us, in its safe voice, &#x27;you&#x27;re so right boss! That&#x27;s brilliant!&#x27;
ChatGTP大约 2 年前
<i>&quot;AI-driven improvements will be especially important for poor countries, where the vast majority of under-5 deaths happen,&quot; he wrote.</i><p>Always with the poor countries. How does he know this won’t totally wreck poor countries ?<p>Climate change is going to absolutely ruin poor countries long before they need an AI doctor which gives false information.<p>Meanwhile wheat does he think these AI doctors run on ? Air?<p>Fossil fuels.
评论 #35255273 未加载
评论 #35255256 未加载
评论 #35255628 未加载
评论 #35255042 未加载
nethdeco大约 2 年前
Its as everyone is getting on the bandwagon, as what generative AI does is easier to understand for most people. But in the same time the uninformed public is not knowledgeable about the failure cases and the limitations. All the tech companies will make a killing adding couple of buzz words to their marketing.
wolverine876大约 2 年前
Don&#x27;t miss the end of the article:<p><i>&quot;Market forces won&#x27;t naturally produce AI products and service that help the poorest,&quot; he [Gates] said. &quot;The opposite is more likely.<p>&quot;With reliable funding and the right policies, governments and philanthropy can ensure that AIs are used to reduce inequity.<p>&quot;Just as the world needs its brightest people focused on its biggest problems, we will need to focus the world&#x27;s best AIs on its biggest problems.&quot;</i>
denysonique大约 2 年前
HN title is clickbait, it should be rename to the actual title of the webpage: &quot;Bill Gates: AI is most important tech advance in decades&quot;
ljw1001大约 2 年前
You lost me at calling AI an “advance”. I think that’s a speculative statement that has yet to earn the positive bias it entails.
评论 #35255146 未加载
alienicecream大约 2 年前
What&#x27;s the hype about? A single textbook would be better than 100 GPT approximations. You have to verify everything it gives you. It doesn&#x27;t have intelligence. It&#x27;s an oracle channeling a random number generator.
nmcela大约 2 年前
What a HUGE shame that the worst and greediest american tech monopolies are leading us into this new world. It feels extremely dystopian. Let&#x27;s hope the OSS community can build something with the llama models.