TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Book ban attempts reach “unparalleled” 20-year high in 2022

69 点作者 hn2017大约 2 年前

12 条评论

joemazerino大约 2 年前
Missing is all the bans for classics like "To Kill a Mockingbird" which enraged history revisionists with older-language. This article tries to frame the data that the majority of book cancellations were targeting LBGTQ books but forgets to mention the banning of classic literature.
评论 #35279027 未加载
评论 #35279296 未加载
评论 #35280609 未加载
LocalH大约 2 年前
On a related note, I never understood why people of a certain political persuasion tend to be against <i>any</i> mention of sexuality even towards <i>teenagers</i>. I&#x27;ve seen more than one such person say that &quot;14 or 15 year old people shouldn&#x27;t be talking about sexuality&quot;. Apparently we shouldn&#x27;t ever be talking to people <i>who have gone through or are going through puberty</i> about sexuality.<p>The whole <i>problem</i> is that people have not properly been taught about sex, because educational institutions have for years, in different areas, been hamstrung (like with all the &quot;abstinence-only&quot; education in areas like the bible belt), and parents aren&#x27;t the best sexual educators (because on a personal level, they don&#x27;t want to even think about that sort of thing). Cue the trope of the angry father telling the daughter &quot;you&#x27;re not dating until you&#x27;re <i>30</i>&quot;.<p>The vast majority of people over the last 60 years have been taught more from some form of pornography (whether it be the stack of Playboys under Dad&#x27;s bed, or the teenager screwing with the horizontal and vertical hold on their TV to try to watch Skinemax, to today&#x27;s young people having access to internet porn). Some of us came out ok, but some people (depending on which porn they learned from) didn&#x27;t.<p>The problem with education being <i>too</i> centralized, is that it results in a choke point for power grabs and indoctrination, if we&#x27;re not careful. Perhaps sexual education should be totally independent from the rest of secondary education?
评论 #35289209 未加载
pjfin123大约 2 年前
&gt; Each attempt to ban a book by one of these groups represents a direct attack on every person&#x27;s constitutionally protected right to freely choose what books to read and what ideas to explore.<p>I don&#x27;t think school library book banning is the biggest threat to free speech today; it&#x27;s mass internet censorship.
评论 #35279922 未加载
评论 #35280269 未加载
mrguyorama大约 2 年前
The idea that &quot;A kid at school should not be aware of anything their parents don&#x27;t want them to be aware of&quot; is mind numbingly stupid. How many gay kids have grown up under homophobic parents? How many little girls are told to be subservient to men and know their place? How many kids live in a household that consistently talks about &quot;those thugs&quot; and other clear racism? These kids all exist and it is stupid to think we should allow those kinds of parents to teach these things to the next generation as if you have some god given right to be a bad person just because you had unprotected sex.<p>I would also hate if a school wasn&#x27;t allowed to talk about the holocaust because a german student&#x27;s dad felt oppressed, and I also hate that the southern states seem to be hell bent on continuing to spread propaganda about the civil war to keep the lost cause myth alive.<p>Just because a parent THINKS &quot;being gay&quot; is sexually suggestive doesn&#x27;t mean that it IS. The world is full of black people, trans people, women, gay people, weird people, dumb people, straight people, sad people etc, and it is morally reprehensible to not teach kids to respect them as fellow human beings just to please someone who has a closed mind. Some day little timmy might have to go to work with someone who doesn&#x27;t fit into your tight knit idea of what a normal person is, and we shouldn&#x27;t saddle timmy with your poor opinions about who deserves the pursuit of happiness. You either think every human deserves a basic amount of respect and dignity or you don&#x27;t.<p>We literally had to go to court in this country just to teach kids that evolution is a thing. This is just more of the same.
评论 #35282578 未加载
评论 #35289844 未加载
评论 #35284653 未加载
评论 #35282530 未加载
评论 #35283803 未加载
Khaine大约 2 年前
I&#x27;m less concerned about people wanting to ban sexually explicit books from children^, and more concerned about all the cultural vandals altering authors works (i.e. Roald Dahl, Ian Fleming, the goosebumps series).<p>^ Its an entire meme now of parents reading these books out at school board meetings and being cut off due to the inappropriate nature of the works.
Steven420大约 2 年前
Unfortunately there are lots of good books that are appropriate for kids being banned along with books that are definitely not appropriate for kids. I remember seeing Maus being banned which I consider to be appropriate for kids
lancesells大约 2 年前
Does anyone have the list of books and examples?
评论 #35282289 未加载
评论 #35287433 未加载
NoZebra120vClip大约 2 年前
The last time I checked, this pearl-clutching over &quot;book bans&quot; was about books being dropped from library shelves or school reading lists, not from the books actually being prohibited for purchase or reading.<p>Come on, folks, censorship is when you use coercive power to completely prevent access to a resource, not when you curate a list and it doesn&#x27;t happen to make the cut.
globalreset大约 2 年前
&gt; The choice of what to read must be left to the reader or, in the case of children, to parents. That choice does not belong to self-appointed book police.&quot;<p>Does it belong to people selecting books in these school libraries even when it goes against the wishes of the parents?<p>While no one should be able to censor what book adults can read, the school libraries are tricky.<p>It was easier to have a consensus on what society at large was finding acceptable when the viewpoints in society converged. Now on one had we have parents who things taking their kids to drag shows is open-minded and surgical sex change in kids should be unconditionally supported, on the other we have various religious groups with their own dogmas.<p>What we expose the kids to obviously does have an influence (at least statistically) on what they will think in the future. So there&#x27;s a big political power in controlling it.<p>So do we just limit everything to subset super-majority finds acceptable?
评论 #35279553 未加载
pessimizer大约 2 年前
So definitely a high paralleled 20 years ago.
londgine大约 2 年前
I recall reading a similarly titled article about how schools are banning books. It ends up that the school just changed their curriculum, so one book was no longer required reading. I think that book was the Holocaust comic book maus. but I may be mistaken.
akomtu大约 2 年前
With these lgbt books bans, people express their vague fear of a dark ideology in the far future that will, in short, put animalistic desires on the pedestal.
评论 #35284231 未加载