TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

For coding answers, Google search may be doomed even without ChatGPT/GPT-4

1 点作者 LrnByTeach大约 2 年前
While coding a Prisma ORM Database insert, I searched for the following string on both Google.com and Phind.com<p>prisma client code to insert record into an autoincrement() column table<p>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=prisma+client+code+to+insert+record+into+an++autoincrement()+column+table<p>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.phind.com&#x2F;search?cache=73025b84-ea43-43d9-b69f-1ab00e876f62&amp;source=cache<p>Google results of the first couple of them did not provide any close code I am looking for, whereas Phind.com search gave a clear answer.<p>This example shows how ‘search revenue addicted Google’ failed to provide ‘point answers’ where as a few person search startup phind.com able to do. I don&#x27;t believe Google is unaware of these new techniques for providing better answers<p>Even if we exclude ChatGPT&#x2F;GPT-4, Google search appears to be lagging in many areas.

1 comment

brucethemoose2大约 2 年前
Yeah.<p>For all Google talks about conserving the quality of search, it sure seems to send me tons of SEO garbage these days, much of which is worse&#x2F;more false than what an LLM could make up.