TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

FF3 user reported bug about SSL certificate warning

7 点作者 vladimir超过 16 年前

2 条评论

nuclear_eclipse超过 16 年前
Unfortunately, there is no solution for stubborn, ignorant users who refuse to read or understand what the computer is trying to tell them...<p>The single biggest obstacle here is not that Firefox couldn't convey the problem to the user, but that the user didn't pay any attention to what Firefox was trying to tell them. When the user thinks they're always right, the software can never tell them otherwise...<p>Granted, I hate FF3's cert complaining process and I'm sure it could be improved, but no matter what you do, short of refusing to accept bad certs, this problem will continue to occur.<p>Oh, and Mozilla, while you try to fix this, will you <i>please</i> add the CACert root certificate to your browser? For the love of God, why should I trust a $5000 certificate from an automated purchase with Verisign any more than a free certificate verified by community members?<p>Edit: the first reply seems to be a better / more thorough explanation of the point I was trying to make: <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org/msg04902.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mail-archive.com/dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.or...</a>
评论 #354002 未加载
评论 #353628 未加载
tptacek超过 16 年前
Long story short: user received the ominous FF3 self-signed cert warning for every site she visited. The problem: the sites weren't using self-signed certs; she was the victim of a MITM attack. Because that's what a MITM attack looks like: indistinguishable from a self-signed cert.<p>The moral: FF3's self-signed cert warning isn't ominous <i>enough</i>.