TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

WiFi protocol flaw allows attackers to hijack network traffic

88 点作者 ilikepi大约 2 年前

6 条评论

WelcomeShorty大约 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;vanhoefm&#x2F;macstealer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;vanhoefm&#x2F;macstealer</a><p>The tools used, and a better readable description of the actual attack.
评论 #35353879 未加载
评论 #35355342 未加载
bjornsing大约 2 年前
Doesn’t seem like a fundamental flaw in the IEEE 802.11 spec, but rather an implementation issue. For example my previous startup (Anyfi Networks) implemented 802.11 in a split-MAC architecture where all encryption is done “in the cloud” and raw encrypted 802.11 frames are tunneled over IP. In such an architecture frames are encrypted long before being put in the power save queue in the access point.
palata大约 2 年前
Interesting!<p>This said, isn&#x27;t it the same kind of attack that a malicious router (on the route between the sender and the receiver) could run? I.e. exploiting a plaintext connection?<p>It feels like using an encrypted connection like HTTPS prevents it, right?
评论 #35353549 未加载
评论 #35355205 未加载
评论 #35355115 未加载
dehrmann大约 2 年前
Is it my imagination, or has TLS always been more secure than Wifi?
jurimasa大约 2 年前
Plot twist: Musk is the leaker.
bilekas大约 2 年前
To exploit this fully you would require a lot of info, on top of that you&#x27;re not getting anything from encrypted TLS packets.<p>If you&#x27;re passing around sensitive information with even TLS then you&#x27;re already exposed to far easier attacks than this.<p>Interesting find but nothing to worry about overall.
评论 #35354062 未加载
评论 #35354035 未加载