TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Should open source projects track you?

3 点作者 andreacavagna大约 2 年前
Hello everyone, I&#x27;m the maintainer of an open-source DeveloperTool (https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Noovolari&#x2F;leapp)<p>With a heuristic of 7000 users daily, I started feeling the need to have more information on how Users are using the project to improve it.<p>Is it the right thing to do to create a better Developer Experience and gain feedback for the end users?<p>On a side: &quot;it&#x27;s acceptable for open source software not to work is a great thing. This makes it easy for anyone to contribute because there are no hurdles from what your work must include or not include - it&#x27;s up to you. Mistakes, or half-baked projects included. You can&#x27;t have innovation without a lot of people being able to contribute and make mistakes, or give up.&quot;<p>As pointed out in the PostHog article below, I extracted some important passage:<p>&quot;From a utilitarian perspective, We believe that tracking the minimum data possible to build useful technology, in a way that doesn&#x27;t share that data with 3rd parties, means that you have the right approach to product analytics in your open source project.&quot;<p>In most cases tracking user data to enrich functionalities means you have to deal with an opt-out&#x2F;opt-in setting (like VSCode does) to get data to the open-source project&#x27;s maintainers; developers are the most sensitive people regarding data.<p>I&#x27;ve never added this tracking on the Desktop App since I&#x27;m worried about the community&#x27;s reaction. And this is a direct message to them.<p>Is it right to have people helping the growth of the open-source project by tracking only fewer data to improve stability and functionality?<p>&quot;All tracking is bad, many say. We disagree. Done right, it enables more and better software in the world. When it&#x27;s applied to open source, it often enables more free software for anyone to use.&quot;<p>P.S. I&#x27;m not yet a user of PostHog, but I want to congrats with them on the article, and the best way (if it is a good thing) to track open-source data is to do it with an open-source project too.<p>All the references are from the below blog post. Great article, guys! =&gt; https:&#x2F;&#x2F;posthog.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;open-source-telemetry-ethical

3 条评论

btown大约 2 年前
There are some situations where I&#x27;d say opt-in telemetry, properly messaged and with transparency&#x2F;user-visible logs about what is uploaded, is fine.<p>But your tool is specifically for handling highly sensitive credentials, and telemetry can be used as part of an attack surface. For your tool, any hint of telemetry, even opt-in, would be a massive red flag.<p>Having a feedback button that launches a plain old mailto: link might be a good balance to provide an additional mechanism to learn about users&#x27; pain points.
评论 #35358833 未加载
jjgreen大约 2 年前
Since PostHog is a commercial user-tracking product, such an argument seems rather self-serving. And justified by utilitarianism? In a moral swamp then ...
评论 #35358669 未加载
pwg大约 2 年前
&gt; Should open source projects track you?<p>Simple answer: NO
评论 #35358571 未加载