On the flip side, the New York Times has refused to pay for a checkmark to peddle its own pro-regime "misinformation". If truthiness and fact-check advocates were logically consistent, they'd have to address the underlying premises of their paradigm. Fortunately for them, they need only be ideologically consistent. As partisans, there is no need to complicate their worldview with nuance. Dissent from the MSM narrative is disinfo/misinfo, simple as.<p>"Walter Durranty's Fact Check Corner"