TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

GNU+Linux laptops with Libreboot preinstalled, based on coreboot

270 点作者 sacrosanct大约 2 年前

15 条评论

javchz大约 2 年前
I love my T440p, and as a Linux machine it&#x27;s great. But full disclosure, it&#x27;s not perfect, a few drawbacks to be aware of:<p>* Batteries can be hard to find, and they last 6 hours at most.<p>* No USB-C docking capabilities (but you can use the old dock that uses the weird port under the laptop). Weirdly enough you can mod it to charge with a USB-C PD cable instead of the thinkpad one.<p>* The iGPU is slow by today&#x27;s standards.<p>* The keyboard is okay, but was a downgrade from the T420 (aka the old IBM layout).<p>* VS the T430, you don&#x27;t have a way to connect a plugable PCI-e port.<p>* The default screen it&#x27;s horrible (but can be upgraded to a nice IPS full hd panel for not that much).<p>If you&#x27;re okay with that, despite its age it&#x27;s a great machine, the CPU it&#x27;s ok for most tasks, and gives you a chance to have an amazing control in your system from OS to BIOS (or well, as close as you can get without digging the full rabbit hole that are firmwares for other components).<p>I say if you only look for bang for the buck... this it&#x27;s not a machine for you, but it&#x27;s more if you want a OSS community backed laptop, this it&#x27;s the one for you in case you don&#x27;t like the framework laptops.
评论 #35498168 未加载
评论 #35497763 未加载
评论 #35503083 未加载
评论 #35499944 未加载
评论 #35498512 未加载
评论 #35522821 未加载
neodypsis大约 2 年前
System76 is a good option if you want modern, performant hardware that runs Coreboot.<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;system76.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;system76.com</a><p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;system76&#x2F;coreboot">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;system76&#x2F;coreboot</a>
评论 #35500911 未加载
评论 #35497817 未加载
评论 #35512175 未加载
评论 #35497954 未加载
lousken大约 2 年前
Since I am daily driving Thinkpad E540 I can say I wouldn&#x27;t buy a 10 year old device at this point.<p>I maxed out mine, using i7 4702mq, 16GB of RAM and 256GB SSD, AC wifi and fullHD display. The machine doesn&#x27;t feel slow for regular day to day tasks. However, the memory is getting close to being full (my AVG is 13GBs used) and the lack of USB-C is starting to really hurt my productivity. Using a docking station or a meeting room without pulling all the cables apart is getting quite annoying. Also the trackpad is really subpar. So at this point I am looking for an upgrade to Framework 16.
评论 #35505288 未加载
candiddevmike大约 2 年前
I was looking at porting a mobo to coreboot (Dell) and learned about Intel boot guard. That kind of thing should fall under right to repair and be illegal. My device, my choice on how I flash it.
评论 #35499324 未加载
neilv大约 2 年前
If you&#x27;d like to run a Coreboot&#x2F;Libreboot laptop, which hardware you use, and whether you have someone do it for you, is probably influenced by how it needs to be flashed.<p>Best case: The particular hardware supports software flashing from the start, with some easily-accessible enable switch or Vulcan nerve pinch boot mode.<p>Medium case: You undo a few screws, and can get easy access with a SOIC test clip, and your ad hoc RasPi programming setup can do a good read or write within a few tries.<p>Worst case: You not only have to desolder SMT, or use a flaky SPI programmer while the flash chip is in-circuit, but you have to pretty completely disassemble and reassemble a laptop. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.neilvandyke.org&#x2F;coreboot&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.neilvandyke.org&#x2F;coreboot&#x2F;</a><p>All cases might be trivial for an EE technician who does this frequently, but, for software person me, the fun quickly turned to headache. Knowing that, Minifree&#x27;s prices might look very good.<p>Note: After the initial flash, subsequent flashes (such as for updates, or your own experimenting) could be done purely by software, unless and until that&#x27;s disabled. This might be less secure, but it could otherwise be very practical. But, even if you have easy subsequent flashes, if one of the flashes breaks the device, you might have to go back to an initial painful flash to fix it.
theK大约 2 年前
16G ram could be cutting it close in a lot of back end Dev workloads... How come there are no bigger options?
doublepg23大约 2 年前
I love my x200 with Coreboot. Very fun to hack around on, though I usually use my Ryzen desktop or iPad Pro M1 for anything requiring cpu power.
therealshiva大约 2 年前
guys i&#x27;m curious... about security: some say intel has a backdoor, but there is this guy Nicola who says it&#x27;s not true... if it&#x27;s not true, why is the driver closed source, and why is it impossible to disable ME?
评论 #35498930 未加载
评论 #35498488 未加载
评论 #35502910 未加载
r3trohack3r大约 2 年前
I love my Libreboot laptop. But haven’t used it lately, because it’s too fragile for my environment (I work in a swimming pool).<p>Same gripe for Raspberry Pi based laptops.<p>I would love to see a Toughbook based version that’s water resistant.
评论 #35499754 未加载
deepthought422大约 2 年前
Minifree operates the one-man version of Libreboot, ladden with insecure blobs.<p>Libreboot.at is the real Libreboot, backed by the FSF, without blobs and mental meltdowns (so far).
javert大约 2 年前
I don&#x27;t understand what part of this (if any) I cannot do at home. Couldn&#x27;t I just run me_cleaner myself and then install the desired OS?
评论 #35499648 未加载
gigatexal大约 2 年前
Leah is doing amazing work. Support them if you can!
评论 #35503437 未加载
egberts1大约 2 年前
Mmmmm, still could have selected an Ethernet hardware without ME.<p>Why bother to disable ME if you could do the right thing?
rurban大约 2 年前
I aplaud the offer.<p>Just this quote is a bit hilarius:<p>&quot;Debian is a solid, robust OS with a strong security team&quot;
cutler大约 2 年前
14&quot; max is a bit of a deal breaker for me but otherwise looks good.