TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Sig Sauer P320, a popular handgun with police, is firing on its own

20 点作者 martey大约 2 年前

7 条评论

4wsn大约 2 年前
For what is self-labelled as an investigation, there&#x27;s very little technical information. At the very least (in my limitedly qualified opinion) the main factor should be identified; were all the holsters in the reported incidents leather? The only acknowledgement of the topic is brief.<p>&gt; as it might be in a warped holster or when a finger or object inadvertently brushes the trigger from its side.<p>&gt; He added that accidental discharges can be caused by improper ammunition, worn holsters or foreign objects working their ways into the trigger guards.<p>If this occurred also with plastic holsters, then I&#x27;d be concerned. But, unsurprisingly, WP decided to not provide this basic information.<p>If they&#x27;re all leather, yes. The holster is a critical part of the weapon system. If you&#x27;re using a leather holster it has a far more limited lifespan than, say, a leather wallet. RTFM.
jacobgorm大约 2 年前
The worst part is the stigma surrounding misfires, with some people even losing their jobs. Danish military is also using this gun in the no-safety version, and have had several misfires. The blame always goes on the users, never the gun.
评论 #35532097 未加载
评论 #35531585 未加载
no-s大约 2 年前
I stressed over this and finally gave in and got a P365, which I tore down and measured various things to assure it wasn’t as naughty as a P320. I wouldn’t even carry (EDC) a nice Glock which some PD reverted to, because of the unfortunate possibility of inadvertent discharge when re-holstering. For the P320 there was no real visibility of the risk from a slight trigger movement - for the Glock you know anything that moves the trigger safety opens the envelope.
评论 #35531522 未加载
slowhand09大约 2 年前
WP is WP. They interviewed me once about firearms. They either misquoted or misunderstood everything we spoke about.
评论 #35548136 未加载
Havoc大约 2 年前
Reminds me of the smoking&#x2F;cancer playbook. Dodge, deny &amp; deflect no matter how obvious it is that there is a real problem<p>&gt;No regulatory body has the power to investigate alleged defects or impose a mandatory recall of guns.<p>Whoever came up with that idea should probably be shot (intentionally)
评论 #35533122 未加载
pinewurst大约 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;EHHcw" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;EHHcw</a>
whoiscroberts大约 2 年前
Glock 43X