TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ban TikTok – But we need a better version of the RESTRICT Act

29 点作者 rc00大约 2 年前

5 条评论

t-writescode大约 2 年前
&gt; but not only is this unavoidable, it’s written in Chinese law.<p>Do we not talk about how Australia requires that its citizens to do the same? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;australia-encryption-law-global-impact&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;australia-encryption-law-global-...</a><p>Again, what makes China special in this arena? And why must millions of tiny (1-10 person) businesses lose their primary niche-finding advertising system to do it? And why must over 100 million people lose their most effective news source and delivery mechanism for it?
评论 #35550781 未加载
Spivak大约 2 年前
People are really really weird about TikTok being a Chinese company when this is what it&#x27;s like dealing with US companies not in the US. Oh no the Chinese government could access your data without you knowing? God would that be horrible, thank god we don&#x27;t do that here hahaha. National Security Letter who? The US would also <i>never</i> use the reach of our private companies to wage information warfare. Literally if you just s&#x2F;Tiktok&#x2F;Facebook this article could be read verbatim about the US. We have the exact same laws and our companies do the same shady shit. On HN I hope I don&#x27;t have to list the scandals from US tech companies.<p>It&#x27;s really hard to read this push as anything other than the new red scare.
评论 #35551992 未加载
评论 #35553353 未加载
gtop3大约 2 年前
&gt; We believe there are specific actions that the RESTRICT Act can mandate that will diminish the risks posed by Chinese apps without compromising the future of the free and open internet.<p>&gt; Prevent US advertisers from doing business with them<p>&gt; Prevent US-based cloud providers from hosting them<p>&gt; Prevent US social media sites from linking to them<p>How can reducing access to internet resources, reducing who can link to what service, and restricting who can do business with whom based on geographic regions be called uncompromising on &quot;free and open&quot;.
asynchronous大约 2 年前
Great, consistent argument as to why privacy matters and why this legislation does the opposite of help.
评论 #35550840 未加载
est大约 2 年前
It&#x27;s just a glorified geo-lock.<p>Why not just disconnect China from the Internet once and for all.
评论 #35550740 未加载
评论 #35553362 未加载