As one of the Twitter replies points out (<a href="https://twitter.com/dirtturd/status/1646618532950450176" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/dirtturd/status/1646618532950450176</a>), there's no way that the pattern on the granite countertop is actually a match, given that in the Instagram photo the match is on the edge of the counter - whereas in the leak, the match is clearly <i>not</i> on the edge of the counter. The floor is also an entirely different color in the leaks v. the Instagram photo.<p>Someone else then raised the point of "well maybe there are duplicate splotches", in which case there would surely be duplicates across <i>many</i> countertops in <i>many</i> homes - probably one with a floor color that actually matches the one shown in the leaks.<p>A couple other folks in that thread seem to assume "well the splotch sample was clearly rotated so the paper could've been on the counter", in which case you'd think some of the leak photos would've shown the edge on which the splotch exists <i>and</i> would've shown more matching splotches. Still flimsy, at best.<p>Assuming the suspect really is guilty, I highly doubt this was how the suspect got caught; it reeks of parallel construction. If this is really the only evidence anyone has of the suspect's guilt, then a conviction in spite of the "evidence" being blatantly non-evidence would be yet another damning condemnation of my country's already-damningly-condemned "justice" system.