TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

NIST Privacy Framework

115 点作者 sacrosanct大约 2 年前

5 条评论

javier_e06大约 2 年前
From their site: &quot;The NIST Privacy Framework is a voluntary tool developed in collaboration with stakeholders intended to help organizations identify and manage privacy risk to build innovative products and services while protecting individuals’ privacy.&quot;<p>What is a voluntary tool? Beats me. Who are the stakeholders? Beats me. Help organizations to manage risk. What kind of risk? Whose privacy? yadda yadda yadda.. Run on sentence. My take away: NIST needs to hire writers.
评论 #35620010 未加载
评论 #35617583 未加载
评论 #35617547 未加载
评论 #35618785 未加载
评论 #35622256 未加载
评论 #35619299 未加载
评论 #35617588 未加载
评论 #35616895 未加载
评论 #35620484 未加载
评论 #35617302 未加载
评论 #35622277 未加载
评论 #35617528 未加载
djha-skin大约 2 年前
Does anyone really still trust these guys after the revelations of the last decade? Seems to me they had their fingers in a lot of pies.
评论 #35623892 未加载
ChikkaChiChi大约 2 年前
This is from 2020
dboreham大约 2 年前
Regulatory capture sausage in the making?
评论 #35623466 未加载
psychphysic大约 2 年前
I know we don&#x27;t have much choice but is this really safe?<p>The recent pentagon papers are nothing if not impressive of how deeply US intelligence is in just about every conversation that matters.<p>So can we trust NIST? As far as I know there have been concerns in the past that they have played ball and so have private security firms.<p>That said maybe a US backdoor is better than all round shoddy engineering?<p>I imagine something like this would be a great way to slip in a weak link.
评论 #35618824 未加载
评论 #35620199 未加载