TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: How can someone develop the skill of explaining things?

4 点作者 deanebarker大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ve reached a point in my career where my main job seems to be explaining technology concepts to people.<p>How... develop-able is this skill? Can this skill be formally developed, or is it something you just grow from experience?<p>I work in the product strategy group of my company. My job involves a lot of presentations -- both formal and impromptu -- about what our technology does, both specifically and how it relates to the larger industry. There&#x27;s also a &quot;thought leadership&quot; component where I bring attention to our products by creating relevant content.<p>I used to think that being a &quot;professional explainer&quot; was just a side thing. I work in strategy, and I just happened to also have to do a lot of presenting. It was just part of the larger job.<p>But, with the help of a friend, I&#x27;ve come to understand that explaining things is really my core skill and the biggest way I provide value to the organization.<p>How can someone become better at this?<p>I did some searching for resources, and a lot of what I found is classically pedagogical. However, I don&#x27;t feel like that captures it. I don&#x27;t do formal training sessions. My job is a lot of &quot;drive-by explanations&quot; -- dropping into situations to clear up a point, explain a concept, elevate something to a bigger picture, etc.<p>I feel like the main skills involved are:<p>* The ability to identify the core point under discussion; the &quot;question behind the question&quot;<p>* The ability to extract an abstract concept from a concrete issue, or vice-versa; understanding the &quot;scale&quot; of the issue, and how it relates to the layers above and below it<p>* The ability to identify thought patterns and models like fallacies and biases, but also methods of analyzing a problem; inductive, deductive, reductive, etc.<p>* The ability to synthesize large amounts of information and know what&#x27;s relevant and what isn&#x27;t<p>* And, absolutely critically: the ability to find an appropriate metaphor to fit a situation (I sometimes half-joke that I&#x27;m the &quot;Chief Metaphor Officer&quot;)<p>I know this is broad. I wish I could be more specific.<p>Is there an identified field or discipline I&#x27;m missing here? Again, pedagogy is close, but doesn&#x27;t quite capture it.<p>How does one develop this skill? I&#x27;m told that I&#x27;m quite good at it, but (1) I&#x27;d always like to be better, and (2) I&#x27;d like to identify ways to develop it, so I can teach others how do it better.

4 条评论

gsatic大约 2 年前
Maybe look into Journalism.<p>Journalism looks like Education&#x2F;Pedagogy but its not. Its info compression. People are busy, attention is finite and you are giving them just enough to stay relevant in whatever game they are involved in.<p>Education is not about compressing info. Its about delivering all the tricks in the book relevant to the subject from one mind into another. Sometimes metaphors required to aid the transfer. But the success of the teacher lies in how much info is transferred over.
GalenErso大约 2 年前
Know your subject in and out. Anticipate questions and mentally prepare answers.<p>Know your audience. Read the room. If people start being bored, speed up and cut straight to the chase.<p>Practice your verbal skills in front of a mirror.<p>People pay closer attention to beautiful people, so try to improve your appearance if you can. Start working out, get a fresh haircut, clear up your skin, that sort of thing.
yuppie_scum大约 2 年前
Find an online course on communications. There’s probably some free ones out out by accredited universities.<p>Study AP level English. Good writing skills and good speaking skills go hand in hand.<p>ToastMasters is a little culty but very valuable for public speaking.
rlsk大约 2 年前
Rhetorical studies.