TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Election conspiracist Mike Lindell must pay $5M to expert who proved him wrong

26 点作者 goodwink大约 2 年前

5 条评论

AnimalMuppet大约 2 年前
In arbitration. Now he&#x27;s saying he&#x27;ll take it to court. Depending on how the arbitration clause was written, he may not find that easy to do. If he does take it to court, well, IANAL, but I doubt he&#x27;ll find it easy to get the arbitrator&#x27;s decision overturned.<p>Past that, he could either refuse to pay, or declare bankruptcy. Both have legal downsides; both also rather strongly damage his public image. (Of course, if he cared about his public image, he would have gotten off this road a long time ago...)
评论 #35647910 未加载
goodSteveramos大约 2 年前
&gt;The cExtractor tool being provided to contest participants after the contest didn&#x27;t help Lindell in the panel&#x27;s view because &quot;the data at issue is the data provided to contestants as part of the Contest, not some data in hundreds of files informally provided later.&quot;<p>thats like saying a zip file must not contain any data because it didnt come with a copy of the unzip program.<p>the underlying arguments for this judgement are just as nonsensical as the contest
评论 #35648528 未加载
评论 #35648775 未加载
评论 #35648500 未加载
im3w1l大约 2 年前
I read the article but I feel like I didn&#x27;t get it. What was the point of this contest? Why were they given some random files that they struggled to even open?
评论 #35648272 未加载
paulpauper大约 2 年前
Audience capture and sunk costs creates an incentive to be more extreme, to dig in even when proven wrong. He messed up big time.
评论 #35647559 未加载
ridiculous_fish大约 2 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=35642772" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=35642772</a>