Content-wise, the good thing is that there is quite some information here. One thing that caught my attention is the phrase <i>"Metro style apps available from Microsoft that support a wide variety of industry-standard media and document formats"</i>. It made me wonder whether we will see a PDF viewer from Microsoft.<p>Style-wise, as often when reading MS 'blog posts', I wonder how many marketeers were in the committee writing it. This post is way longer than its content deserves, with repeated almost content-free adjectives such as "unique" or "intrinsic". To make things worse, it seems to suffer from serious copy-paste errors (for examples, search for "has a very high degree of commonality" or "enables creativity").<p>The post also sometimes almost conflicts with itself due to what I imagine to be marketing forces. For example: <i>"WOA builds on the foundation of Windows"</i> vs "With WOA you can look forward to integrated, end-to-end products—hardware, firmware and WOA software, all built from the ground up"<p>I also found it funny to read <i>"of what we call, for the purposes of this post, Windows on ARM, or WOA"</i>. Are they really thinking that will prevent people from calling it WOA elsewhere? In a similar vein, we have <i>"Note: This is not a product plan or even a hint at a product."</i> and <i>"(which are not the subject of this post)"</i> Phrases like that belong in a press release, not in a blog post.<p>As a final reason why I do not like the writing style, I had to laugh when, over 1300 words in the article, I find "This post is organized with the following sections"