TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How to spend money on your friends without it looking like bribery

331 点作者 Kortaggio大约 2 年前

50 条评论

steveBK123大约 2 年前
The subtlety in this article is real.<p>While logically money is fungible, it is the illusion of not seeing the transaction happens that makes people feel welcome to enjoy hospitality in case of a friends beach house, dinner guest, catered party guest, etc. As soon as there is an explicit, incrementally attributable transaction triggered by their attendance, people often feel compelled to offer cash.<p>If you invite people over for dinner &amp; cook, or its a catered party, they all feel comfortable. As soon as you order takeout or ask what they want, they feel compelled to split the check. Even more so when dining out. Even the difference between ordering an array of dishes in advance vs asking what they want &#x2F; ordering once they&#x27;ve arrived totally changes how people respond.<p>It gets very awkward when you are trying to host &amp; treat people, but they insist on compensating with cash.<p>For me, I don&#x27;t get the point of having wealth&#x2F;resources if I can&#x27;t share them freely. Especially if you come from a more modest background and now make 5x what some of your friends&#x2F;family do.
评论 #35741206 未加载
评论 #35741217 未加载
评论 #35741199 未加载
评论 #35742764 未加载
评论 #35741252 未加载
评论 #35741204 未加载
评论 #35741179 未加载
评论 #35762608 未加载
评论 #35743436 未加载
评论 #35754953 未加载
评论 #35742975 未加载
bippingchip大约 2 年前
The article overlooks a fundamental side of the social contract that is at least equally, if not more, important: how much time and effort (not money) do personally invest to spend time with your friends.<p>In my view, it&#x27;s only awkward when the money side of things is not aligned with the personal investment.<p>That dinner example from the article actually shows this: I buy you all Olive garden dinner, or: I take the time to invite you to my home, spend some time clean the house think on what to by and prepare, what music to play, maybe a movie to watch after etc. in order to have a good time together. This is a much more thoughtful and mutually beneficial form of investment in friendship than just throwing money at it.<p>Another example could be: Hey, I bought a new board game (or PS5 or something else), wanna come over and play? You might have spent quite some money, but the goal is to be able to invest in spending time with your friends.<p>The moment that is (or is perceived to be) your main intent, most folks would have a hard time looking at this as bribery.
评论 #35745704 未加载
评论 #35742414 未加载
评论 #35740871 未加载
评论 #35740922 未加载
Hugsun大约 2 年前
I highly recommend the book Debt: The First 5000 Years for anyone that finds these things interesting. It is full of similar anecdotes from around the world and throughout history.<p>In some cultures, settling all debts with a friend is akin to declaring the friendship over. As owing or being owed something is a type of bond which is broken when nothing is owed. Breaking the bond implies that you want to break all ties with the person as both are free to walk away. They often manage this by taking turns borrowing small items while making sure that there is always an imbalance.<p>Regarding the OP, there are so many norms and expectations regarding money and they are so varied around the world. My way of dealing with uncertainties like this is just to talk about them in an impartial way.
评论 #35744269 未加载
评论 #35745713 未加载
d--b大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ve had friends invite me in houses they rented. I invited friends in houses I rented.<p>I invented people at restaurants, I&#x27;ve been invited to restaurants. I cooked for friends, and friends cooked for me.<p>What&#x27;s weird? I don&#x27;t understand.<p>EDIT: I am not talking about reciprocation, I was invited to restaurants I couldn&#x27;t really afford by people richer than me, I invited poorer people to restaurants and to vacations, etc.
评论 #35741515 未加载
评论 #35741250 未加载
评论 #35741763 未加载
评论 #35741846 未加载
评论 #35742458 未加载
评论 #35743572 未加载
评论 #35740885 未加载
评论 #35741001 未加载
评论 #35740859 未加载
marpstar大约 2 年前
I love picking up the check but I <i>never</i> tell my guests ahead of time. I don&#x27;t want them compromising on their order, or feeling weird until they absolutely have to. I guess this <i>does</i> require friends who&#x27;d be willing&#x2F;able to pick up their own tab, but it&#x27;s only a few times a year.<p>I&#x27;ve got a lot more than I need and I&#x27;d rather spend it giving friends a night out than on more toys. I don&#x27;t want or expect the same in return, just a &quot;thanks&quot; and a good time together.
评论 #35742266 未加载
jameshart大约 2 年前
I mean, it can definitely still look like bribery.<p>In business relationships we all know that inviting a potential client out to dinner, paid for by the vendor, creates at least the possible impression of impropriety unless the amount spent is relatively modest. Doing the same for, say, the government inspector from your industry’s regulatory body… looks even worse.<p>If the vendor has a sponsorship arrangement with a sports team that means they already have access to a corporate box, that doesn’t change the fact that the hospitality offer looks… dubious.<p>The nature of your ownership&#x2F;rental of the assets involved has no bearing on this. The nature of how it affects your power relationship with the recipient is what matters.<p>The standard - especially when it comes to dealing with government employees - is ‘avoid even the appearance of impropriety’, right?<p>Or at least I certainly thought it was until reading about the Clarence Thomas situation. Apparently there are different rules for billionaires.
评论 #35741269 未加载
评论 #35745803 未加载
评论 #35745937 未加载
conformist大约 2 年前
The vacation home example somehow actually feels less awkward to me, perhaps because my visit doesn’t change the cost incurred by the friend when they’re renting? (Whereas the restaurant bill feels very awkward and transactional, because the increase is directly related to what I order.)
评论 #35741057 未加载
评论 #35741615 未加载
评论 #35740909 未加载
评论 #35740856 未加载
floatrock大约 2 年前
In a round-about way, this article is really talking about how to holistically enrich one&#x27;s life: there&#x27;s other forms of Capital beyond Financial Capital, and something out there makes us feel icky when there&#x27;s too much focus on Financial Capital.<p>Depending on the specific guru you&#x27;re reading, there&#x27;s 3&#x2F;5&#x2F;8&#x2F;whatever &quot;Forms of Capital&quot;. A 5-framework is something like:<p>- Financial Capital<p>- Material Capital<p>- Social Capital<p>- Intellectual Capital<p>- Human Capital<p>An 8-framework might split something like &quot;Human&quot; into Experiential, Spiritual, Cultural, and Living.<p>Point is, when we adopt the everything-is-transactional lens, we tend to see everything as exchanges of Financial Capital. And we lose sight of our other deep monkey-brain needs, like a sense of community and social belonging.<p>So inviting someone to your personal beachhouse rather than vacation rental doesn&#x27;t &quot;feel&quot; like bribery because it&#x27;s closer to trading Social or Experiential Capital rather than Financial Capital. And, for better or worse, &quot;bribes&quot; is (colloquially) closely tied just to Financial Capital.<p>(It becomes nefarious when you exploit this feeling mismatch to, say, trade types of capital with your judicial buddy in ways that look awfully close to a supreme influence on a political case...)
swe_dima大约 2 年前
I am in love with travelling, and one of my dreams is travelling with friends.<p>But my friends, not being from a 1st world country or having a high paying job, can&#x27;t afford that.<p>I have tried on several occasions offering to pay for the trip, but unfortunately, like the article says, most people don&#x27;t feel comfortable if you do that.
Jedd大约 2 年前
&gt; Subscribe to my private email list to read articles that were too sensitive to share online.<p>In an article discussing the nuance of language, and leveraging power imbalances for fun and profit, that&#x27;s a nice way to sign off.<p>Anyway, my first <i>proper</i> introduction to really deeply considered word selection was during the 90&#x27;s BBS era when someone organising a social event -- that was necessarily targeted at a bunch of (probably) socially inept people, myself included -- explained to me that they avoided any conventional phrasing like &#x27;come and join us&#x27; as it instantly implied there&#x27;s an &#x27;us&#x27; that <i>they</i> weren&#x27;t already a part of.<p>Such a small observation at the time, but had a big impact.
virtualritz大约 2 年前
I don&#x27;t understand this. I never had this problem.<p>When you invite people for dinner, it&#x27;s assumed you cook (and this pay for the food) anywhere I lived.<p>Europe, India, Asia that is.<p>Drinks are also assumed to be on the host but most people will bring a bottle if they want to drink alcohol.<p>But that&#x27;s still no expected from the host unless explicitly verbalized with the invitation.<p>When I invite eight people, each of them (or each couple) don&#x27;t don&#x27;t know how many we will be all together.<p>When I shout people at a restaurant, I just secretly pay when I come back from the bathroom, after desserts have been ordered.
评论 #35741605 未加载
wnolens大约 2 年前
I&#x27;ve had to accept that I cannot spend as much money on my friends&#x2F;family as I&#x27;m willing or able to.<p>It&#x27;s really made me reconsider the value of money. If I can buy a house in the city or in a desirable neighborhood, but none of my friends&#x2F;family can then having money&#x2F;using it in that way is isolating.<p>And I&#x27;ve arrived at identical solutions - cooking instead of picking up the tab, sharing apartment rentals that I was going to rent anyway.<p>Additionally: When someone gets married or has a child it&#x27;s acceptable to give a larger gift.
taubek大约 2 年前
I also guess one has to take cultural differences into account. In some cultures one will get offended if you pick up a tab, in others it is expected to split the bill. Am I right?
评论 #35741186 未加载
评论 #35740821 未加载
santoshalper大约 2 年前
Yeah. Appreciate the hypothesis, but I&#x27;m not buying those examples. &quot;Hey I rented a house for the weekend, wanna come party with me on the beach&quot; isn&#x27;t awkward at all. Asking how much you paid for it would be super weird though.
评论 #35740839 未加载
评论 #35742403 未加载
buggythebug大约 2 年前
I have a friend that could buy everyone in the room a ferrari and still have enough money left to over to buy everyone of their friends a ferrari. He has never paid for food or drinks once. This guide is not for everyone.
评论 #35740655 未加载
评论 #35740725 未加载
评论 #35740735 未加载
评论 #35743667 未加载
greybox大约 2 年前
The resteraunt one maybe has some weight behind it, but I fail to see how this is awkward: &quot;I rented a vacation home on the cape for the weekend, wanna come hang out on the beach?&quot;<p>In fact, a friend of mine invited me to do the same thing at Christmas time this year, and it didn&#x27;t feel awkward at all!<p>Maybe this is more of an American culture point?
barrysteve大约 2 年前
Shallow meaning.<p>- Ownership is also a negative, you pay for upkeep, maintenance, admin and inventory of a house. You keep the wealth AND the costs.<p>- When you go to someone&#x27;s house for dinner, you&#x27;re not being bribed, you&#x27;re relating to the owner of the house. The way you relate to the owner and their friends, influences your future friendship.<p>- The home owner is not temporarily letting friends access his house. His friends can&#x27;t rifle through his drawers and live at his house. He is inviting them in for dinner. At most, you are sharing a portion of his house and his hospitality for an evening.<p>- If you buy stuff for me, I&#x27;ll say thank you, but honestly I don&#x27;t always want what you intend to buy for me. If you&#x27;re not going to relate to my meaning and values, even when you&#x27;re being &quot;generous&quot;, then what&#x27;s the point of being a friend?<p>Money and physical goods among non-poor adults, are not a &quot;default win&quot; in friendships. The real generousity in buying a gift is relating to what the other person cares about and giving a small token of that.<p>Wealthy people have many friends. It&#x27;s always true, unless the wealthy person rejects it. People elect themselves to be friends with the wealthy.<p>Money, gifts and generosity can&#x27;t buy friendship from people who don&#x27;t relate the way you do.<p>I get this site is mostly about programming, startups and money, but jeepers. Did we lose the middle way and common sense so quickly?
motohagiography大约 2 年前
This is pet issue of mine, as I am often a guest and have rarely had the means to reciprocate the hospitality I have been offered. Even times when I did have something that was mine to share, the percieved power imbalance in sharing it was sometimes odd in the relationship.<p>However, I almost always accept hospitality because I know what a pleasure it is to give it, and I never feel like I owe someone anything as a result, as it would be a huge insult to them to interpret their generosity as having strings. As I have become older, I&#x27;ve also learned to be a bit suspicious of people who don&#x27;t accept hospitality or insist weirdly on splitting down to the cent because it is a good indicator they are reserving some moral license to betray or otherwise screw you later. I&#x27;ve heard them say it&#x27;s a matter of being equal, yet they haven&#x27;t considered that in rejecting my goodwill they have admitted that they have wasted my time.<p>Picking up a tab is not settling debts either, that&#x27;s taking an opportunity to add some value to the time you spend together. I know the feeling of the chips being down all too well, and interpeting someones generosity as pity, but that&#x27;s the sting of pride, and it deprives people who actually like you of the enjoyment of being able to be some relief.<p>The best way I have seen money spent on others is, &quot;this thing is happening, it&#x27;s already settled and done and everything is taken care of, we just need good company to be able to enjoy it, if you are able, you should really join us, there are no costs except getting there and maybe some drinks.&quot; I think that approach works all the way from concerts to holidays.
评论 #35746238 未加载
Taylor_OD大约 2 年前
&gt; &gt; I’m taking you and 12 friends out to dinner at Olive Garden. I’m paying the check. Wanna come?<p>&gt; To me this feels… tacky? Like I feel obligated to at least offer to cover part of the check right?<p>Maybe it was growing up poor but... Nope. If you want to do something nice for your friends then great. I&#x27;m glad I&#x27;m your friend.
zokier大约 2 年前
Isn&#x27;t the article ignoring marginal vs fixed cost? Adding extra plate to dinner table or having extra guest in a cottage has small marginal cost vs having additional guest in restaurant or renting one room larger vacation home.
xrd大约 2 年前
I kept expecting that he would mention Clarence Thomas at some point but he never did.
评论 #35743469 未加载
评论 #35741123 未加载
klntsky大约 2 年前
&gt; when you consider the value of your friend’s time, plus the amortized cost of cookware, appliances, furniture, and housing—the home meal could be more expensive than the restaurant meal.<p>For someone who cooks only at parties, sure.
JohnFen大约 2 年前
&gt; To me this feels… tacky? Like I feel obligated to at least offer to cover part of the check right?<p>What&#x27;s tacky about that? Why feel the obligation? These are your friends, right?<p>Although perhaps different sets of friends have different social mores.<p>In my group, doing things like that isn&#x27;t rare, although more commonly the offer to pick up the check isn&#x27;t part of the invite, but is just done when the check comes. Nobody feels strange about it because (like &quot;lending&quot; money to each other), everyone does things like this occasionally and averaged over the years, we pretty much all break even anyway.
评论 #35744142 未加载
flamebreath447大约 2 年前
It might not be a popular opinion but all the comments about cultural differences, or needing to be careful with communication seem wrong to me.<p>Someone offering you a gift to pay shouldn’t come off as rude or a power play of wealth. It shouldn’t be a surprise to you that some people are more well off. If a kind gesture makes you feel awkward, guilty or lesser that’s insecurity on you, not them.<p>Maybe, just maybe, you are bad at receiving gifts.<p>Let’s be charitable and stop assuming people are doing something weird. Yes we can communicate better but we don’t need to walk on eggshells just to be kind to friends.<p>I absolutely love treating friends. I intentionally invite people to dinner, don’t tell them ahead of time that I’m paying so they order exactly what they would have normally. I excuse myself to the restroom and ask the waiter to use my card at the end.<p>The few times I’ve had people had an issue or feel bad, I was extremely clear with them that<p>1. I want to, it brings me joy to give my friends gifts 2. I do not expect anything in return, I just wanted to spend time and enjoy a dinner with them 3. I purposely budget to do this, it’s the same as me inviting them over for cooked dinner 4. If they are deeply hurt or bothered by it I have no problem with them paying the portion and won’t do it again if it wasn’t something that made them feel cared for or enjoyed<p>I’ve never had anyone ever come back to point (4)
评论 #35741718 未加载
petesergeant大约 2 年前
Dating can be complicated like this. Last time I was single, I had quite a bit more money than the people I was dating, and if we went for dinner, I wanted to eat at much nicer places than they did. The magic solution here was to say simply &quot;I&#x27;m going to choose the place, but give me $20&#x2F;$50 towards dinner&quot; and then to pay for everything else ... it made stuff so much less weird, even if dinner ended up being an order of magnitude more expensive.
评论 #35742148 未加载
WesolyKubeczek大约 2 年前
I was expecting an article about how to spend money on your friends so they don&#x27;t feel like you&#x27;re going to ask them favours in return.<p>Turns out the article is not about this at all. But.<p>Dammit, I can likely afford to take some friends to a (local) restaurant and pay the whole bill, no questions asked about contents of those fancy drinks. I&#x27;m very unlikely to have time or skill to cook for 14 myself. I would go to a restaurant with someone after making sure that them volunteering to pay the bill is not a &quot;yes, but actually no&quot;. If someone invited me to a home party I would certainly feel more than obligated to participate in bringing in produce, booze, and sharing the labour of preparing the food and cleaning up after.<p>I can afford to rent some place to escape, but <i>owning</i> a whole cottage on the cape? Are you saying it&#x27;s better to own a cottage just so that invitation is not awkward for you? I can&#x27;t wrap my head around the concept. I would surely be curious about the costs of having such a thing.<p>The whole feel of the piece is incredibly first world to me. The author (and their friends) seem like people who would smirk at you if you only had one yacht, or if your golf course was too small. Book a hotel, and it&#x27;s awkward. Just buy a cottage instead.
_pastel大约 2 年前
Some ways to make recipients feel more comfortable:<p>- You can suggest some other contribution. &quot;Would you mind bringing snacks? &#x2F; Would you mind handling music on the drive? &#x2F; Would you mind giving X a ride?&quot;<p>- You can allow them to reciprocate in less expensive situations, like taking the check when you are at a cheaper place.
ZoomZoomZoom大约 2 年前
It&#x27;s really easy. If you directly spend more than your friend could ever afford to take from their disposable income if you switched places and while being overly emotional&#x2F;drunk&#x2F;etc., you&#x27;re taking on the risk of hurting their dignity.<p>Taking your friend for a ride in your expensive car should be fine, giving them the keys for a week is absolutely not.<p>If you <i>really</i> want to lash out, like @ilyt said, make it invisible: spend on preparations or takedown, maybe arrange a little happy accident, or just spend normally and donate the rest to your friend&#x27;s cause of choice.<p>First world problem, if I ever saw one.<p>Now, talking about power dynamics, meaning of work and success for interpersonal relationship, it&#x27;s a whole another level of complexity that&#x27;s important, but it&#x27;s not just about the money.
nibbleshifter大约 2 年前
This was... Weird.<p>Like, none of the &quot;awkward examples&quot; really track as awkward?<p>I genuinely don&#x27;t get the point of this article.
评论 #35741992 未加载
评论 #35741212 未加载
photochemsyn大约 2 年前
Having the ability to shower friends and family with gifts - and doing so - is a fundamental requirement for social status in every human society. The king who invites all the nobles to a great feast, the Hollywood socialite who hosts the most splendid post-Oscar party, the Pacific Northwest tribal chieftan who has the largest potlatch celebration, are all acting out this tradition. The latter may be less familiar:<p>&gt; &quot;A potlatch involves giving away or destroying wealth or valuable items in order to demonstrate a leader&#x27;s wealth and power. Potlatches are also focused on the reaffirmation of family, clan, and international connections, and the human connection with the supernatural world. Potlatch also serves as a strict resource management regime, where coastal peoples discuss, negotiate, and affirm rights to and uses of specific territories and resources. (wiki)&quot;<p>Distribution of resources within societies has historically varied quite a bit, so in the more egalitarian societies, the situation is more reciprocal, with people giving as many gifts as they receieve on average. Highly unequal societies end up with &#x27;noblesse oblige&#x27; behavior as gifts tend to flow from the wealthy to the poor, which has been used as a justification for the aristocrat&#x2F;serf system of feudalism.<p>These patterns of behavior are a kind of societal glue, and when they break down it tends to lead to revolutions and overthrow of the social order, as in late 18th century France, early 20th century Russia, etc. This probably also accounts for some of the failures of authoritarian state communism, as all resources end up controlled by state authorities (e.g. it&#x27;s probably hard to throw a private party for friends in North Korea).<p>In terms of day-to-day living in democratic capitalist societies, people instinctively understand this dynamic and much of the awkwardness this article discusses relates to the fact that people are always keeping account of who gives what to who, even if it&#x27;s just unconscious behavior. It also explains why inter-class friendships can be much more difficult to maintain than any other type, i.e. inter-faith, inter-race, etc.
squokko大约 2 年前
I had a friend who was the son of a billionaire who threw elaborate dinner parties at his house and he very generously asked for $20 for each attendee. The food obviously cost more than $20 but paying the $20 made us feel like we weren&#x27;t freeloading.
w10-1大约 2 年前
It&#x27;s not the bribery but the reciprocity and equality. When does it create an obligation?<p>Another example is bringing food or drink. Generally when we bring comestibles to share, no one expects to have to reciprocate, because we&#x27;re all sharing. But if you offer the host a gift, it creates entanglements.<p>Generally I try to shift the frame to the shared activity - eating, brainstorming, gaming, etc. so people feel that if they are participating, they are contributing.<p>For dinners out, I don&#x27;t think rich people should presume they have the right to pay before anyone gets a chance to contribute. It takes away the agency of others.
roenxi大约 2 年前
These situations are logically equivalent and the differences are fairly subtle. It would be interesting to know whether most people would be able to pick the difference between the two approaches.<p>I suppose it is a higher-status play to have spare resources available instead of having to deplete your finances to do favours for friends. Maybe one approach suggests a deeper understanding of other people&#x27;s needs which is good signalling. But at the end of the day if you give someone something with no strings attached, that is what happened. The method isn&#x27;t so important.
bastawhiz大约 2 年前
I love everything Bill writes. One of the things that I very much miss about working at Stripe is getting to read the very thoughtful notes that he would send out.
sdfghswe大约 2 年前
&gt; It’s not merely a matter of expense; when you consider the value of your friend’s time, plus the amortized cost of cookware, appliances, furniture, and housing—the home meal could be more expensive than the restaurant meal.<p>No it couldn&#x27;t, this is complete bullshit. The amortization from a one time on something that you use every day for many years use is nothing.<p>This person sounds like he never actually cooks. That&#x27;s all I&#x27;m saying.
评论 #35741979 未加载
eljimmy大约 2 年前
I think mentioning that you&#x27;re paying the cheque is tacky. Just invite them and pay for their meal silently as a nice surprise to the end of dinner.
yieldcrv大约 2 年前
The dinner party example isnt so cut and dry<p>It does feel more comfortable to not be expected to be paying for anything<p>But its also common to chip in, amongst my loosely affiliated friends. Or its a potluck to begin with.<p>When its the host cooking, yeah you’re just there and partaking.<p>On the other far extreme, its my friends have private chefs, and I know thats even more expensive than the host cooking, but yeah that also has no charge expected.
SergeAx大约 2 年前
Now, THIS is the first compelling reason to own a yacht and not charter it. Never thought of it this way.
Aeolun大约 2 年前
Hmm, I kinda feel like me directly paying for friends (or telling them I’ll pay) sets up an unhealthy expectation.<p>On one hand I want to do things with people (even if they can’t pay themselves), on the other hand, I don’t want them to come to me and expect me to pay.
tumnus大约 2 年前
This must be a specific cultural thing. In my group of friends and family, generous offers like those used in the examples aren&#x27;t seen as &#x27;tacky&#x27;. They&#x27;re just generous and speak to a spirit of wanting to share.
fiftyfifty大约 2 年前
Just have some kids! My adult children are always happy to let us spend money on them. Come to think of it, my wife and I still let our parents pay for stuff as well, even though they really don&#x27;t need to anymore.
beebeepka大约 2 年前
Now, I made a little money, good But I still want to live in the hood But buying new fly shit Is just like inviting ants to a picnic There&#x27;s just too many sets And now I&#x27;m getting those kidnap threats
bawolff大约 2 年前
Makes sense. If you are spending money, people want to split the cost. If you are sharing something you already have and would have regardless, even if it costed money originally, no need to split costs.
scyzoryk_xyz大约 2 年前
I highly recommend an episode of How To with John Wilson titled “How to Split the Check”<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;LsMdnCO7AOA" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;LsMdnCO7AOA</a>
penjelly大约 2 年前
interesting observations, my guess is ownership implies the sense of regularity and therefore less pressure on the individual to attend. Backing out last minute means less if theyre heading out to the cottage as usual anyway, youre just a tagalong after all.
snapcaster大约 2 年前
This was good food for thought, thanks for posting
SubiculumCode大约 2 年前
rich people problems
EGreg大约 2 年前
In Capitalism, you are always encouraged to own instead of rent. The benefits of private ownership are extolled. Capitalists are shocked by “in 2030, you’ll own nothing and be happy.”<p>Ownership is an idea that allows companies that build things to sell excess capacity and luxury stuff. Like real estate in growing economies (China, or the American Dream in past decades of USA). Or like carmakers in the USA until recently.<p>Own that car! Then look how much unused metal is parked on the street most of the day, so carmakers can create more. When self-driving cars come along, our cities will become more beautiful again, with less parking lots and lanes. It’s also inefficient in more ways than one — a study in San Francisco found that 30% of all traffic is just circling looking for parking: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reinventingparking.org&#x2F;2013&#x2F;10&#x2F;is-30-of-traffic-actually-searching-for.html?m=1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reinventingparking.org&#x2F;2013&#x2F;10&#x2F;is-30-of-traffic-...</a><p>Ownership is right to exclude all others from using a resource, even if you are not using it. So if I own a bike, no one else who needs it can use it, it just sits in the closet, thus more bikes are required to be sold to society. With CitiBike, or other bike sharing programs, bikes are rented on demand.<p>So one of the benefits is that you can project wealth and excess, and invite your friends to use the thing that no one could be using anyway.<p>The millennials and later generations are fine to rent on demand, even including clothes (“rent the runway”). They join clubs like SoHo club that let them use facilities on demand when they travel. It’s a different approach. And there, since it’s on-demand, there is less waste but also it becomes clear when someone is subsidizing someone else.<p>That said … now that there is so much capacity built (eg commercial and residential real estate) that SOMEONE has to own it, we may as well own it collectively (housing cooperatives) and schedule use of it (eg cooperative time shares) than the exploitative landlord model and airbnb model that raises rents sky-high.<p>Housing cooperatives. Taxi cooperatives. Credit unions. Eliminate the shareholder class, and let everyone own the network. Socialism online, without violence of the State. Someone should build that ;-)<p>PS: It just requires software to self-organize. And it is far better for the environment. Producing one electric car takes a lot of fossil fuels, and if they were shared we’d cut down on production and have more efficient consumption to recoup the costs after 70,000 miles.<p>PPS: Cooking at home is different from the above, because people typically buy food and consume food before it spoils. In fact, the post is wrong — going out to a restaurant is far more expensive than the supermarket food. Most societies until the 1990s did not afford to eat out all the time but they certainly invited people over quite often! House parties also gives a great reason to visit each other.
评论 #35741032 未加载
评论 #35741176 未加载
评论 #35741216 未加载
评论 #35741998 未加载
Freire_Herval大约 2 年前
Friend offered me 10 billion dollars of cash in several suit cases. Felt awkward so I didn&#x27;t accept.
bryanlarsen大约 2 年前
One option is to say something like &quot;When (you get a 6 figure job, your options vest, ...), you can return the favor or pay it forward&quot;. Two birds with one stone: express confidence in the person and make it feel less awkward.
评论 #35740951 未加载
评论 #35740893 未加载
评论 #35746056 未加载
评论 #35740976 未加载
评论 #35741011 未加载
评论 #35741248 未加载