TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Four questions concerning the internet

39 点作者 raptorraver大约 2 年前

12 条评论

calderwoodra大约 2 年前
Am I the only one who immediately writes off authors that mention Microsoft's Syndey as something scary/to be worried about? The whole "it said <scary thing>" seems overblown to me
评论 #35768042 未加载
评论 #35767202 未加载
yowzadave大约 2 年前
&gt; Even in the mid-1980s, Black had noticed how hours spent on a computer were changing him. ‘I noticed that my thinking became more refined and exact,’ he wrote, ‘able to carry out logical analyses with facility, but at the same time more superficial and less tolerant of ambiguity or conflicting points of view.’<p>Well this skewers the worst tendencies of the HN comment section…
gregfjohnson大约 2 年前
Signature properties of human language and consciousness are recursion and self-awareness. As ChatGPT and its ilk continue to vacuum up basically all of the human-generated content on the net, more and more of that content will be discussion of ChatGPT and its ilk. These AI&#x27;s already do an impressive job of composing essays in response to questions about the impact of AI&#x27;s (that is, themselves). It feels like we are (mataphorically) probing around in the dark, with electric probes, connecting parts of circuits to other parts of circuits, and we are getting close to inadvertently closing circuits that will &quot;levitate&quot; these technologies into something like internally stimulating and augenting self reference. I would prefer we not do this.
labster大约 2 年前
I don’t see why people are so worried about AI in the future. AI has been exploiting humans for 500 years already, and destroying Earth’s habitability for the last 150 years.<p>I’m talking about our first AIs, the corporations. They maximize their goals at any cost, live forever, assimilate other corporations, and frequently trick humans to engage in unsafe behavior for their own benefit. They expand to control more and more territory, concentrate power to themselves, and seek to make humans dependent on them — while at the same time polluting everywhere to make the human race weaker. They don’t intend this, they just have an alien code of ethics that worships shareholder value as the height of virtue.<p>How is computer AI going to be worse than what we’re already doing?
评论 #35768093 未加载
评论 #35778866 未加载
cholmon大约 2 年前
The fourth question is in a later blog post, &quot;The Neon God&quot; - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paulkingsnorth.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;the-neon-god" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paulkingsnorth.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;the-neon-god</a>
twic大约 2 年前
There&#x27;s an HTML, non-Scribd, version of the mentioned book (pamphlet?) by David Black here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wn.rudolfsteinerelib.org&#x2F;RelArtic&#x2F;BlackDavid&#x2F;DB1981&#x2F;CmpAhr_index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wn.rudolfsteinerelib.org&#x2F;RelArtic&#x2F;BlackDavid&#x2F;DB1981&#x2F;...</a><p>Seems the author does technical due diligence at a VC firm now:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.blackliszt.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;10&#x2F;what-is-technical-due-diligence-for-venture-capital.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.blackliszt.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;10&#x2F;what-is-technical-due-dil...</a>
评论 #35768363 未加载
sbaiddn大约 2 年前
My favorite luddite on the only tech site worth reading. HN, how do you keep doing it? :D<p>His part Two is available (to subscribers at least)
评论 #35768380 未加载
评论 #35774283 未加载
评论 #35778882 未加载
zamnos大约 2 年前
&gt; Question One: why does digital technology feel so revolutionary?<p>The digital revolution, which began some 30 years hence, has little to do with the more recent advancements in AI&#x2F;ML. The reason digital technology feels so revolutionary is because it is - it&#x27;s our first glimpse into a post-scarcity future. Distribution costs for a digital work to all of humanity is low, and approaches zero <i>if we get rid of copyright</i>.<p>Copyright is an antiquated system, suitable only for a pre-digital age. We need a better system. One that incentivizes the creation of works while also admitting that DRM to make bits uncopyable is like trying to make water not wet. If instead every copy that was distributed over the Internet, including via Bittorrent paid the author back, suddenly it&#x27;s not a problem anymore. There are other problems&#x2F;details to be worked out, but the first step is in admitting you have a problem.
评论 #35768132 未加载
NumberWangMan大约 2 年前
&gt; Out there, said all the old tales from all the old cultures, is another realm. It is the realm of the demonic, the ungodly and the unseen: the ‘supernatural.’ Every religion and culture has its own names for this place. It lies under the barrows and behind the veil, it emerges in the thin places where its world meets ours. And the forbidden question on all of our lips, the one which everyone knows they mustn’t ask, is this: what if this is where these things are coming from?<p>Both yes and no, in a sense.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;slatestarcodex.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;07&#x2F;30&#x2F;meditations-on-moloch&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;slatestarcodex.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;07&#x2F;30&#x2F;meditations-on-moloch&#x2F;</a><p>We are doing this because our individual incentives are not aligned with those of the group. Moloch is the god of misaligned incentives, of coordination problems, of arms races and races to the bottom. It&#x27;s a property of any system with selfish actors, which means any system that humans are part of, and probably any intelligent being that arose out of natural selection would have been hypothetically been part of.<p>From `Meditations on Moloch`:<p>&gt; There’s a passage in the Principia Discordia where Malaclypse complains to the Goddess about the evils of human society. “Everyone is hurting each other, the planet is rampant with injustices, whole societies plunder groups of their own people, mothers imprison sons, children perish while brothers war.”<p>&gt; The Goddess answers: “What is the matter with that, if it’s what you want to do?”<p>&gt; Malaclypse: “But nobody wants it! Everybody hates it!”<p>&gt; Goddess: “Oh. Well, then stop.”
throwaway202303大约 2 年前
Boring
smitty1e大约 2 年前
The internet is a mechanism that has had a catalytic effect on the viscosity of information.<p>Animus against that catalyst is so much hormonal groaning.<p>Human nature is constant.
mftb大约 2 年前
From the linked post:<p>&gt; I cheated a bit there, I admit. I changed one of the words. The name that the saint used in that passage was not ‘Ahriman’. It was ‘Antichrist.’<p>That&#x27;s manipulation. That&#x27;s gross. That&#x27;s a shame. There are some interesting ideas in the post.
评论 #35767596 未加载
评论 #35767654 未加载