My assertion below. Prove me wrong :)<p>It's clear that a lot of people don't understand the basic tenets of strong authentication, which is best done with at least:<p>1. Something you know
2. Something you have<p>This is the heart of MFA. The problem with passwords is around point #1 — "something you know". For so long this has been the ONLY thing to authenticate, and that's a serious problem, because people don't do the #1 very well.<p>So for years people tried to strengthen #1, which has been a fruitless battle. People continue to write down passwords, they continue to make them insecure, and not rotate them.<p>But that's the whole point of MFA.<p>The crusade should be about getting to MFA, not abolishing #1.<p>The problem with Passkey, is it just swaps #1 with #2, and if anything, gives a very large false sense of security, because most people I know who do actually do MFA also do it on their phone, which is also the same device doing their passkey.<p>Infact some people think that Passkey is a replacement for having MFA!<p>But it really isn't much different than just using a password manager.<p>Because most people use their phone for their MFA (right or wrong), now we are just at:<p>1. Something you have.
2. The same thing you have.<p>And folks, that's no longer MFA!<p>I'm not saying Passkey is bad, I'm saying this crusade to kill the password is completely misaligned, it's confusing people, and it's really better to focus on explaining to people the point of MFA (the above two things).<p>Passkey is, at best, a QOL thing.<p>It's BETTER than weak passwords that are never changed. It's BETTER than even strong passwords that are never changed.<p>But it's really not any different than strong passwords with rotation, and a password manager.