TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

At Musk’s brain-chip startup, animal-testing panel is rife with conflicts

140 点作者 wootland大约 2 年前

3 条评论

jjk166大约 2 年前
&gt; In response to an inquiry from Reuters, the USDA said it had found no conflicts of interest on Neuralink’s board when the department inspected its animal-research operations during 10 inspections since 2020. The company has passed all inspections with no citations, according to public records and a person with knowledge of the examinations.<p>I&#x27;m not going to get too worked up by a private company doing something that has received no complaints from the federal agency in charge of overseeing it. If you think the USDA&#x27;s regulations are too lax, that&#x27;s something that we the people can potentially change.
评论 #35836376 未加载
评论 #35837043 未加载
评论 #35840041 未加载
dmbche大约 2 年前
&quot;The USDA employs 122 inspectors to inspect 11,785 facilities, ranging from zoos and breeders to labs, according to a Congressional Research Service report last July.&quot;<p>What? Jesus that&#x27;s so absurd
评论 #35836636 未加载
评论 #35836645 未加载
awb大约 2 年前
&gt; Nineteen of the board’s 22 members were Neuralink employees as of late 2022, according to a company document reviewed by Reuters. The oversight board’s chair was the Neuralink executive who led the company’s animal-care program, and at least 11 other members were employees directly involved with animal care or research.<p>Employees controlling the board sounds highly unusual for most companies, but for maybe not for a moonshot company? Didn’t Zuckerberg negotiate total control of the FB board?<p>And aren’t most boards incentives linked to company performance?<p>I’m definitely concerned about the ethics for animal testing, but I’d never trust a company or board to regulate itself. That’s what the government and the law is for. If there are concerns the government should step in.
评论 #35835820 未加载
评论 #35835818 未加载